|
|
c |
hronic |
d |
isease |
c |
hronic |
d |
isease |
n |
otes & |
r |
eports |
n |
otes & |
r |
eports |
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion |
Volume 14 • Number 1 • Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health |
Inside |
Reducing the Burden of Chronic Disease: |
• |
Commentary............. 2 |
• |
Coordinated School |
Promoting Healthy Behaviors Among Youth |
Health Programs |
Make a Difference .... 6 |
• |
Secretaries Send Youth |
Physical Activity Report |
to the White House . 10 |
• |
Reaching and Protecting |
Young People .......... 14 |
• |
Asthma: 10 Million |
School Days Lost |
Each Year ................. 18 |
• |
Michigan Gets Moving |
With PE Curriculum 19 |
• |
Utah’s Unique |
Approach to School |
Health ...................... 20 |
• |
Gold Medal School |
Project Guides Health |
Policies .................... 21 |
• |
Healthier Smiles: |
Children’s Oral |
Health ...................... 22 |
• |
Study Will Strengthen |
I |
School Health Policies |
and Programs .......... 24 |
n February, the top TV show |
Survivor |
activity and fruit and vegetable consump- |
• |
How States Are Using |
reached more than 29 million |
tion and reduce tobacco use among youth, |
YRBSS Data ............. 26 |
viewers in one night—a huge audi- |
we would be well on our way to a healthier |
• |
CDC Supports |
ence—yet, every school day, our nation’s |
future in this nation,” said Lloyd Kolbe, |
International School |
Health Activities ...... 31 |
teachers beat that rating, reaching 53 |
PhD, Director, Division of Adolescent and |
million children, each with a survival |
School Health, NCCDPHP, CDC. |
• |
Media Campaign |
Planned.................... 32 |
challenge. Taught to make healthy choices, |
Risk Behaviors Lead to Major |
these children improve their chances, not |
• |
cdnotes .................... 32 |
Chronic Diseases |
only to survive, but to thrive into healthy |
adult and senior years. CDC recognizes the |
Cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabe- |
U.S. DEPARTMENT |
school years as an ideal opportunity to |
OF HEALTH AND |
tes, which cause more than 70% of all |
reduce the impact of chronic disease and |
HUMAN SERVICES |
deaths in the United States, are rooted in |
Centers for Disease |
risky behaviors by promoting healthy |
Control and Prevention |
lifestyles. “If we could increase physical |
C |
, |
3 |
O NTI NU E D |
PA G E |
2 |
Fall 2000 |
Special Focus: |
Cancer |
Commentary |
Commentary |
Commentary |
Schools Could Help Prevent |
Lloyd J. Kolbe, PhD |
Cardiovascular Disease, |
Director, Division of Adolescent |
and School Health |
National Center for Chronic Disease |
Cancer, and Diabetes |
Prevention and Health Promotion |
I |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
n every state of our nation, cardiovascular disease |
and implement effective policies and programs to |
(CVD), cancer, and diabetes are responsible for |
prevent health problems. These strategies are 1) |
about two-thirds of all deaths, widespread ill- |
monitoring critical health events and school policies |
nesses, enormous health care costs, and extensive |
and programs to reduce those events; |
human suffering. Much of the morbidity and mortal- |
2) synthesizing and applying research to improve |
ity from these three diseases results from four risk |
school policies and programs; 3) enabling constituents |
factors that usually are established during youth: |
to help schools implement effective policies and |
tobacco use, unhealthy diet, inadequate physical |
programs and 4) conducting evaluation research to |
activity, and obesity. Once these often interrelated risk |
improve policies and programs. CDC will use these |
factors become established during childhood, they are |
strategies to enable the nation’s schools to simulta- |
difficult to modify during adulthood. Unfortunately, |
neously prevent risks for CVD, cancer, and diabetes, |
by the time they graduate from high school, 40% of |
especially among populations with a disproportionate |
our nation’s students smoke cigarettes, 73% don’t eat |
burden of these diseases—notably, African Americans, |
enough fruits and vegetables, 43% don’t engage |
Hispanics, and Native Americans. |
regularly in vigorous physical activity, and 25% of our |
In this issue of |
Chronic Disease Notes & Reports |
, you |
children and adolescents already are overweight or at |
will read about some current efforts, including the |
risk of overweight. |
groundbreaking |
President’s Report on Physical Activity |
; a |
Each generation of Americans attends school for 13 |
youth media campaign that will target middle school |
of the most formative years of their lives. Carefully |
youth with health messages; and school health activi- |
designed and coordinated school health programs— |
ties in Michigan and Utah. Also, we will share how |
including school health education, school food |
the coordinated school health programs model works. |
service, and school physical education—could reduce |
Improving the education and health of all children |
these risk factors among the 53 million young people |
within our own communities and across the globe— |
who attend school each year, especially if school |
and especially disadvantaged children—will present |
programs are integrated with related community |
opportunities and challenges. Purposeful and focused |
efforts. |
collaborations among public and private national, |
A wide range of public and private national, state, |
state, and local health and education agencies could |
and local agencies are interested in working with |
enable the nation’s 117,000 schools to establish the |
schools to reduce one or another of these risk factors |
kinds of polices and programs that would significantly |
separately. During the past decade, CDC has institu- |
reduce the burden of chronic diseases among future |
tionalized four strategies that can help schools and |
generations of Americans. |
these agencies efficiently and collaboratively identify |
cdnr |
3 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Promoting Healthy Behaviors |
Top 10 Physical Activity, Nutrition, |
Among Youth |
and Tobacco-Use Prevention Priorities |
C |
1 |
O NTINU E D |
F R O M |
PA G E |
for Schools |
risk factors that are usually established |
during youth: tobacco use, unhealthy diet, |
1. Assess school’s physical activity, nutrition, and tobacco- |
inadequate physical activity, and obesity. |
use prevention programs and plan for improvement |
Once poor health habits are adopted, they |
(i.e., use CDC’s |
School Health Index |
). |
are difficult to change. Data show that |
2. Review and improve school’s physical activity, nutrition, |
many young people are already at risk for |
and tobacco-use prevention policies (i.e., use the |
serious chronic diseases and premature |
National Association of State Boards of Education’s |
Fit, |
death: 70% of high school students have |
Healthy, and Ready to Learn |
). |
tried smoking at least once, 71% do not |
3. Use research-based health education curriculum. |
attend daily physical education classes, and |
4. Establish an active School Health Council, with involve- |
25% are overweight or at risk of becoming |
ment from representatives of all components of the |
overweight. Addressing these factors |
Coordinated School Health Program. |
through coordinated school health pro- |
5. Implement quality wellness program for school staff |
grams could improve health, spare lives, |
and for students and their families. |
and reduce the burden on our economy |
6. Implement quality physical education programs. |
and health care system as this generation |
7. Increase opportunities for physical activity in addition |
reaches adulthood. |
to physical education and interscholastic sports |
(e.g., recess, intramurals, clubs, fitness trails, and walking |
Partners Help CDC Prevent |
to school). |
Chronic Disease |
8. Implement quality school meals programs. |
CDC is providing support to three state |
9. Establish a healthy school nutrition environment |
professional organizations as part of a new |
(e.g., healthier food choices outside of school meals). |
chronic disease prevention initiative: the |
10. Establish tobacco-free schools. |
Society of State Directors of Health, |
Physical Education, and Recreation |
(SSDHPER), the Association of State and |
Territorial Chronic Disease Program |
disease, cancer, and diabetes. CDC is also |
Directors (ASTCDPD), and the Associa- |
working with the American Heart Associa- |
tion of State and Territorial Directors of |
tion and the American Cancer Society to |
Health Promotion and Public Health |
build effective national approaches to |
Education (ASTDHPPHE). CDC’s |
reduce chronic disease health risk behav- |
formalized collaboration with these |
iors among young people. The new |
organizations and others, including the |
initiative is intended to help the nation’s |
American Heart Association and the |
schools implement effective tobacco-use |
American Cancer Society, should help |
prevention, physical activity, and nutrition |
bolster resources and coordinate efforts at |
programs that can prevent or reverse |
the state and national levels to support |
unhealthy patterns before they take hold in |
school health programs. CDC recently |
students’ lives. “By working together, we |
hosted a meeting with representatives from |
are able to reach a broad range of health |
SSDHPER, ASTCDPD, and |
professionals to improve chronic disease |
ASTDHPPHE to develop plans to equip |
prevention and health promotion and have |
school health programs with strategies and |
a greater impact on the health of our |
tools to reduce the risk of cardiovascular |
nation’s youth,” commented CDC health |
4 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
scientist Pete Hunt, MEd, MPH. |
based guidelines for school health pro- |
grams on how to promote physical activity |
National Plan to Improve |
and healthy eating and prevent tobacco |
Adolescent and School Health |
use. (See “Top 10 Physical Activity, |
Nutrition, and Tobacco-Use Prevention |
CDC employs four national strategies to |
Priorities for Schools,” p. 3.) Two impor- |
improve young people’s health: |
tant tools were released in 2000 to help |
• Monitor critical health events and |
schools implement school health guide- |
school policies and programs. |
lines. |
• Synthesize and apply research to |
Y |
The first is the |
School Health Index |
improve school policies and programs. |
RBSS data |
(SHI) for Physical Activity and Healthy |
• Enable constituents to help schools |
Eating: A Self-Assessment and Planning |
provide the |
implement effective policies and |
Guide |
, which provides a checklist ques- |
best, and in many |
programs. |
tionnaire to rate school polices and pro- |
cases the only, |
• Evaluate to improve policies and |
grams against CDC standards. “The SHI |
programs. |
source of data on |
will help schools identify the strengths and |
youth behaviors. |
weaknesses of their health promotion |
Monitor critical health events and |
policies and programs and develop an |
school policies and programs |
action plan for improving student health,” |
Key to monitoring chronic disease risk |
commented Dr. Wechsler. “It gives them |
factors among young people is CDC’s |
something concrete and specific they can |
Youth Risk Behavior Sur veillance System |
do to improve school programs and |
(YRBSS; online at |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp |
services.” The SHI is online at |
/dash/yrbs/index.htm |
). Since 1991 this |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/SHI |
. |
system has tracked tobacco use, physical |
The second tool, |
Fit, Healthy and Ready |
activity, dietary intake, and weight control |
to Learn |
, was developed by the National |
behaviors of high school students. “YRBSS |
Association of State Boards of Education |
data at the national, state, and city levels |
with CDC support. This tool is a guide to |
are used extensively and typically provide |
school health policy development. It |
the best, and in many cases the only, |
focuses on policies related to physical |
source of data on these behaviors,” ex- |
activity, healthy eating, and tobacco-use |
plained CDC health scientist Howell |
prevention. Dr. Wechsler said, “This |
Wechsler, EdD, MPH. In addition to |
document translates the broad vision of |
YRBSS, CDC conducts the School Health |
the guidelines into concrete, specific policy |
Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS). |
language that proponents of school health |
SHPPS, which was conducted in 1994 and |
programs can bring to their school |
2000, provides nationally representative |
boards.” This tool is online at |
data on various school policies and pro- |
www.nasbe.org/healthyschools/ |
grams including physical education, food |
fithealthy.mgi |
. |
services, and health education. Analyses of |
Other resources include |
SHPPS data, to be published in 2001, will |
• CDC’s Healthy Youth Funding |
assess all eight components of CDC’s |
Database (HY-FUND), which gives |
coordinated school health program model |
users access to current information on |
at the elementary, middle, and high school |
federal funding, state revenue fund- |
levels. |
ing, and private sector funding. The |
database offers examples of how states |
Synthesize and apply research |
use federal funds to support adoles- |
to improve school policies |
cent and school health programs. Visit |
and programs |
the site at |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ |
dash, |
and |
click the “Funding” button. |
In the mid-1990s, CDC released science- |
cdnr |
5 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
• A database service developed by the |
providing support one day to all 50 state |
National School Boards Association |
education agencies and health depart- |
provides sample school district health |
ments, along with education and health |
policies on request. The database also |
agencies in many of the nation’s large |
provides advice on getting policies |
cities,” said CDC health scientist Diane |
adopted by local school boards. Visit |
Allensworth, PhD. |
www.nsba.org/schoolhealth/ |
Evaluate to improve policies |
database.htm |
for more information. |
and programs |
• CDC, as part of the Research to |
Classroom program, has identified |
CDC developed a process evaluation |
and compiled in |
Programs That Work |
manual as an assessment tool for states |
(PTW) a list of curricula with credible |
with coordinated school health programs |
evidence of effectiveness. Two to- |
and provides support to these states for |
bacco-use prevention programs have |
evaluation. Also, economic evaluation |
been identified in PTW: |
Project |
studies are being conducted to identify |
Toward No Tobacco |
and |
Life Skills |
cost-effective programs. |
Training |
. |
Other strategies |
Enable constituents to help schools |
These four national strategies serve as |
implement effective policies |
concrete objectives in the fight against |
and programs |
chronic disease. In addition, state-, school-, |
and district-level guidelines have been |
CDC helps constituents establish policies |
and programs to reduce chronic disease |
outlined. CDC and its partners are em- |
phasizing the need for local districts and |
risk factors among youth by supporting |
the development of coordinated school |
states to implement effective strategies to |
improve school health. For instance, |
health programs in the education agencies |
and health departments of 20 states. For |
tobacco settlement money is being used in |
Maine to fund a comprehensive cardiovas- |
example, states are using CDC guidelines |
to develop model health education cur- |
cular health project. Specific outcomes will |
include the assessment of health education |
ricula or specific instructional objectives |
that identify precisely what students |
standards and monitoring of physical |
fitness of all Maine students and the |
should know and be able to do after |
completing a health education course. To |
placement of a health coordinator in 35 |
school districts. Until all school districts |
improve school health, CDC recently |
hosted two school-based tobacco preven- |
take an aggressive and effective approach |
to reduce chronic disease risk factors |
tion workshops for 20 state teams, with |
representatives from state education and |
among young people, the number of |
premature deaths due to cardiovascular |
health agencies on each team. In addition, |
other federal agencies and national organi- |
disease, cancer, and diabetes will remain |
high. |
zations are key partners in the fight against |
cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes |
To find out more about CDC’s coordi- |
nated school health programs, visit |
and their risk factors. “We expect to work |
closely with all our partners and envision |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash |
. |
6 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Coordinated School Health Programs |
Make a Difference |
E |
very school day, 53 million young |
has a place in achieving that goal,” said |
people attend the nation’s 117,000 |
Eva Marx, a school health consultant. |
schools. What we do to promote |
“Establishing and maintaining coordi- |
their health today will shape the future |
nated school health programs and all their |
health of the nation. In addition to read- |
components in schools is our primary |
C |
ing, writing, and arithmetic, they need to |
issue,” said William H. Datema, MS, |
oordinated |
know how to preserve and promote their |
Executive Director, Society of State |
school health |
own health, as well as the health of the |
Directors of Health, Physical Education, |
not only improves |
generation they will raise, by making |
and Recreation. |
children’s health, |
healthy choices. School health advocates |
The long-term issue in CSHPs is |
it improves the |
urge schools to focus on health in a |
lifelong health. Research has shown that |
coordinated way, not only keeping health |
risk behaviors, often established during |
learning capacity |
and physical education (PE) in the daily |
youth, account for most of the deaths from |
of c hildren. |
schedule, but including other components |
chronic diseases: tobacco use, unhealthy |
needed to make the school a healthy |
diets, and inadequate physical activity. |
environment supportive of healthy behav- |
Obviously, equipping young people to |
iors. These components involve the full |
resist these behaviors can have a great |
spectrum of the school community and |
impact on reducing the toll of illness and |
address food service, staff wellness, and |
death in their future. |
family and community support (see “A |
Because of competing demands, educa- |
Coordinated School Health Program: The |
tors and administrators may not consider |
CDC Eight Component Model of School |
the need to make a school health program |
Health Programs,” p. 7). The benefits of a |
coherent and complete, but coordinated |
coordinated school health program |
programs offer many advantages. They |
(CSHP) go well beyond improved physical |
increase efficiency, reduce redundancy, and |
conditioning and health, and they are |
are more cost-effective. “Most schools have |
immediate as well as long-term. “Coordi- |
many health activities but not in a coordi- |
nated school health not only improves |
nated, targeted way,” said Ms. Marx. “It |
children’s health, it improves the learning |
can be quite haphazard.” CDC’s coordi- |
capacity of children,” said Lloyd Kolbe, |
nated school health program helps educa- |
Director of CDC’s Division of Adolescent |
tors focus attention and resources on |
and School Health. |
school health, gives them concrete objec- |
An immediate issue is that children can’t |
tives, and shows them how to harness |
learn if they’re tired, hungry, on drugs, or |
available resources. It supports schools that |
worried about violence or domestic |
want to improve their school health |
problems. CSHPs merge such issues of |
programs and empowers them by making |
health and education. Schools with CSHPs |
them part of a national network of other |
report better attendance, less smoking, |
states with similar programs. |
lower rates of teen pregnancy, increased |
The Need for Standards |
participation in physical fitness activities, |
and greater interest in healthier diets. “The |
Accountability is a requisite of any sound |
reason schools are educating children is so |
educational system. At the core of account- |
that they can become productive, respon- |
ability are academic standards, which drive |
sible members of society. Health certainly |
curriculum development, instruction, and |
C |
, |
8 |
O NTI NU ED |
PA G E |
cdnr |
7 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
A Coordinated School Health Program: The CDC Eight-Component |
Model of School Health Programs |
T |
he following are the eight |
access or referral to primary health |
to the health of students and creates |
components of CDC’s model |
care ser vices, foster appropriate use of |
positive role modeling. Health |
coordinated school health program: |
primary health care services, prevent |
promotion activities have improved |
and control communicable disease and |
productivity, decreased absenteeism, |
Health Education: |
A planned, |
other health problems, provide |
and reduced health insurance costs. |
sequential, K–12 curriculum that |
emergency care for illness or injur y, |
addresses the physical, mental, |
Counseling and Psychological |
promote and provide optimal sanitary |
emotional, and social dimensions |
Services: |
Services provided to |
conditions for a safe school facility and |
of health. The curriculum is |
improve students’ mental, emo- |
school environment, and provide |
designed to motivate and assist |
tional, and social health. These |
educational and counseling opportuni- |
students to maintain and improve |
services include individual and |
ties for promoting and maintaining |
their health, prevent disease, and |
group assessments, interventions, |
individual, family, and community health. |
reduce health-related risk behav- |
and referrals. Organizational |
Qualified professionals such as |
iors. It encourages students to |
assessment and consultation skills |
physicians, nurses, dentists, health |
develop and demonstrate increas- |
of counselors and psychologists |
educators, and other allied health |
ingly sophisticated health-related |
contribute not only to the health of |
personnel provide these ser vices. |
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and |
students but also to the health of |
practices. The comprehensive |
Nutrition Services: |
Access to a |
the school environment. Profession- |
curriculum includes a variety of |
variety of nutritious and appealing |
als such as certified school counse- |
topics such as personal health, |
meals that accommodate the health |
lors, psychologists, and social |
family health, community health, |
and nutrition needs of all students. |
workers provide these services. |
consumer health, environmental |
School nutrition programs reflect the |
Healthy School Environment: |
health, sexuality education, mental |
Dietary Guidelines for Americans |
The physical and aesthetic sur- |
and emotional health, injury |
(published by the U.S. Department of |
roundings and the psychosocial |
prevention and safety, nutrition, |
Agriculture and the Department of |
climate and culture of the school. |
prevention and control of disease, |
Health and Human Services; see |
Factors that influence the physical |
and substance use and abuse . |
www.health.gov/ |
environment include the school |
Qualified, trained teachers provide |
dietaryguidelines/ |
) and other |
building and the area surrounding it, |
health education. |
criteria to achieve nutrition integrity. |
any biological or chemical agents |
The school nutrition services offer |
Physical Education: |
A planned, |
that are detrimental to health, and |
students a learning laboratory for |
sequential K–12 curriculum that |
physical conditions such as tem- |
classroom nutrition and health |
provides cognitive content and |
perature, noise, and lighting. The |
education, and serve as a resource |
learning experiences in a variety of |
psychological environment includes |
for linkages with nutrition-related |
activity areas such as basic move- |
the physical, emotional, and social |
community services. Qualified child |
ment skills; physical fitness; rhythms |
conditions that affect the well-being |
nutrition professionals provide these |
and dance; games; team, dual, and |
of students and staff. |
services. |
individual sports; tumbling and |
Parent/Community Involve- |
gymnastics; and aquatics. Quality |
Health Promotion for Staff: |
ment: |
An integrated school, |
physical education should promote, |
Opportunities for school staff to |
parent, and community approach for |
through a variety of planned physical |
improve their health status through |
enhancing the health and well-being |
activities, each student’s optimal |
activities such as health assessments, |
of students. School health advisory |
physical, mental, emotional, and social |
health education, and health-related |
councils, coalitions, and broadly |
development, and should promote |
fitness activities. These opportunities |
based constituencies for school |
activities and sports that all students |
encourage school staff to pursue a |
health can build support for school |
enjoy and can pursue throughout |
healthy lifestyle that contributes to |
health program efforts. Schools |
their lives. Qualified, trained teachers |
their improved health status, im- |
actively solicit parent involvement |
teach physical activity. |
proved morale, and a greater per- |
and engage community resources |
sonal commitment to the school’s |
Health Services: |
Services pro- |
and services to respond more |
overall coordinated health program. |
vided for students to appraise, |
effectively to the health-related |
This personal commitment often |
protect, and promote health. These |
needs of students. |
transfers into greater commitment |
services are designed to ensure |
8 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
training and technical assistance to pro- |
Coordinated School Health Programs |
Make a Difference |
gram staff in each funded state and local |
C |
6 |
education agency to help improve policy |
O NTINU E D |
F R O M |
PA G E |
development and implementation, cur- |
riculum design, and teacher training. |
assessment by precisely and scientifically |
Specific technical assistance in evaluation |
defining what students should know and |
assists program staff to continually im- |
do in each subject area and at specified |
prove health and physical education in |
grade levels. Schools, districts, and state |
their state. |
education agencies are held accountable on |
I |
the extent to which students in their |
Coordination Demands Good |
f health and |
respective jurisdictions achieve these |
Communication |
physical educa- |
standards. Establishing standards and |
What makes school health programs |
assessments also helps to place health and |
tion are in the |
physical education as equal in importance |
“coordinated” is strong collaboration |
state standards, |
between state agencies of education and |
to other educational disciplines. |
they’re much |
Standards reflect the state’s educational |
health. “Coordination at the local level is |
more likely to be |
really important, too, but without the state |
priorities, and priorities drive resources. |
taught in the |
That’s why it was a victory when Kentucky |
piece, it’s very hard to achieve,” said Jenny |
schools. |
Osorio, MPA, CDC. Funding and organi- |
was recently able to establish a content |
team that integrates practical living, |
zation of states in CDC’s coordinated |
school health program focuses on helping |
vocational studies, and cardiovascular |
health. Previously, content teams were |
states to establish and run a statewide |
program for coordinated school health. |
limited to the core academic subjects of |
mathematics, science, social studies, and |
These programs address a range of health |
issues. Currently many focus on reducing |
language arts. States such as Kentucky, |
Missouri, and Maine have also succeeded |
chronic disease risk factors including |
tobacco use, poor nutrition, and physical |
in having health and physical education |
accepted as core academic subjects that are |
inactivity. |
States in CDC’s coordinated school |
assessed. |
Without standards, overburdened |
health program are encouraged to hire two |
coordinators: one in the state department |
schools with overloaded curricula some- |
times try to find more room in the school |
of education, one in the health depart- |
ment. In many states the partnership |
day by eliminating or reducing require- |
ments for physical education and health. |
between the agencies is regarded as a |
unique strength. In New Mexico, for |
In states like Wisconsin, however, which |
established a requirement for health |
instance, Kris Meurer, PhD, School Health |
Director, State Department of Education, |
education in the 1970s, the place of health |
and PE in the curriculum has not been |
shares a business card with Laurie Mueller, |
her counterpart in the Department of |
challenged. “If health and physical educa- |
tion are in the state standards, they’re |
Health. People can call either of them to |
have their concerns addressed. “Our |
much more likely to be taught in the |
schools,” said Mr. Datema. Having state |
criterion is that projects will go to the |
agency that can most easily accomplish the |
standards often enables the state depart- |
ment of education to retain staff who help |
task,” said Dr. Meurer. |
It’s important to remember that educa- |
local districts meet the requirements by |
offering technical assistance and guidance |
tion agencies aren’t health agencies, noted |
Ms. Marx, who recalls once being advised |
on program and staff development. |
CDC’s adolescent and school health |
to “talk and think like an educator.” The |
field of education has its own language, |
program plays a vital role by providing |
cdnr |
9 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
making it difficult for outsiders to com- |
ized plan can be developed. In Kentucky, |
municate with educators. “Health isn’t |
for instance, a private nonprofit group |
their priority, but they do realize that |
called Kentucky Child 2000 collected data |
health concerns can be a barrier to learn- |
on 30 communities. The information will |
ing,” said Ms. Marx. |
allow the state to put resources where they |
“It’s not necessarily hard for health |
are most needed. Funding for the assess- |
officials and educators to work together,” |
ment was provided by a collaborative effort |
said Mr. Datema. “The challenge is for |
of four state agencies: the Department of |
each group to understand the other’s |
Education, the Cabinet for Health Ser- |
priorities and to find mutual goals. One |
vices, Cabinet for Families and Children, |
way CDC has really had an impact is in |
and the Department of Juvenile Justice. |
helping states develop those relationships.” |
The Kentucky Department of Education, |
Another benefit of working with CDC |
through a cardiovascular health grant |
is the cadre of leaders it provides. More |
funded by CDC, expanded the study to |
experienced states provide models for |
examine the extent to which the eight |
others. “CDC’s role has been critical,” said |
components of coordinated school health |
Mr. Datema. “Its developmental model has |
are implemented in these communities. |
helped states work together.” Another role |
CDC surveillance efforts also support |
was in bringing nongovernmental organi- |
states by gathering information on school |
zations to the table. Said Janet Collins, |
health policies and programs and youth |
PhD, Deputy Director, NCCDPHP, |
risk behaviors [see related articles, “Study |
CDC, “CDC’s support and funding of |
Will Strengthen School Health Policies |
national education agencies helped them |
and Programs” and “States Are Using |
to support local schools in establishing |
YRBSS Data to Improve the Health of |
effective programs.” |
Teenagers,” pp. 24 and 26]. CDC also |
States in CDC’s CSHPs also have the |
provides technical assistance to state and |
opportunity to participate in training |
local education agencies in evaluating their |
programs with their counterparts in other |
own programs, with tools such as the |
states. Attendees not only learn how to |
School Health Index. The Index is a self- |
incorporate health messages into their |
assessment and planning guide that |
curriculum, they are able to return home |
describes how to set up cross-functional |
and educate others to do the same. In May |
teams, and provides worksheets and |
2000, teams from 15 states attended |
checklists for evaluating how thoroughly |
training in physical activity, nutrition, and |
health concepts are being integrated into |
tobacco programs. Each state had one |
all areas of school life. |
representative from education and one |
Coordinated school health is “truly |
from health. Presentations focused on |
primary prevention,” said Ms. Osorio. |
resources that could be used to promote |
“We know that it is more difficult to |
the need for CSHPs. |
change unhealthy behaviors once they are |
established. This is where we can really |
A Customized Approach |
make a difference. This is a good invest- |
ment for our nation to make.” |
Statewide planning means careful needs |
and assets assessments, so that a custom- |
|
10 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Secretaries Send Youth Physical Activity |
Report to the White House |
The Secretaries’ report— |
Promoting |
Better Health for Young People Through |
Physical Activity and Sports |
—was released |
to the public at a White House ceremony |
on November 29. The directive that the |
Department of Health and Human |
Services and the Department of Education |
would work together in preparing this |
report underscores the important role that |
schools can play in reversing the obesity |
epidemic and promoting the health of our |
nation’s young people. The report focuses |
strongly on ways to foster the renewal of |
physical education in our schools and the |
U |
expansion of after-school programs that |
offer physical activities and sports in |
Former President |
nhealthy habits, such as tobacco |
addition to enhanced academics and |
Clinton is surrounded |
use, poor dietary patterns, and |
cultural activities. |
by America’s Olympic |
physical inactivity, are fueling an |
The report also highlights a critical need |
athletes at a White |
House ceremony at |
obesity epidemic and an array of related |
for environmental change. People feel they |
which the former |
health problems among the nation’s youth. |
have few safe or efficient choices for |
President announced |
To help address these urgent problems, |
getting around town other than by auto- |
the release of the report |
former President Clinton asked the |
mobile. They have few destinations within |
Promoting Better |
Secretary of Health and Human Services |
walking distance, limited access to recre- |
Health for Young |
and the Secretar y of Education to produce, |
ational venues, and limited time for |
People Through |
within 90 days, a report on strategies to |
recreational activities because of long |
Physical Activity and |
promote better health for our nation’s |
commutes. Therefore, the report also |
Sports. |
youth through physical activity and fitness. |
encourages the development of supportive |
“By identifying effective new steps and |
public policy and describes ways to pro- |
strengthening public-private partnerships, |
mote greater coordination of existing |
we will advance our efforts to prepare the |
public and private resources to shape |
nation’s young people for lifelong physical |
environments—for example, building |
fitness,” Mr. Clinton said. |
more walking and bicycle paths and |
The request followed the January 2000 |
designing neighborhoods in a grid pattern |
publication of |
Healthy People 2010 |
, a |
with connecting streets—that encourage |
listing of the nation’s health objectives for |
physical activity and sports. |
the decade. Unlike previous sets of na- |
In other words, “Make the healthy |
tional health objectives, |
Healthy People |
choice the easiest choice,” said Susan B. |
2010 |
included a set of leading health |
Foerster, MPH, RD, Chief, Cancer |
indicators—10 high-priority public health |
Prevention and Nutrition Section, Califor- |
areas for enhanced public attention. The |
nia Department of Health Ser vices. |
fact that the first leading health indicator is |
Working together, the Secretaries, their |
physical activity and the second is over- |
staff members, and their partners in |
weight and obesity speaks clearly to the |
private and nongovernmental organiza- |
national importance of these issues. |
tions identified the following important |
cdnr |
11 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
factors for helping young people increase |
10 Strategies for Promoting Lifelong |
their levels of physical activity and fitness: |
Physical Activity |
• |
Families |
who model and support |
T |
participation in enjoyable physical |
hese strategies emphasize the importance of collabora- |
activity. |
tion at all levels among families, schools, youth-serving |
• |
School programs— |
including quality, |
organizations, community planners, policymakers, and state- |
daily physical education; health |
level education and public health officials. |
education; recess; and extracurricular |
activities—that help students develop |
1. Include education for parents and guardians as part of |
the knowledge, attitudes, skills, |
youth physical activity promotion initiatives. |
behaviors, and confidence to adopt |
2. Help all children, from prekindergarten through grade 12, |
and maintain physically active |
to receive quality, daily physical education. Help all |
lifestyles, while providing opportuni- |
schools to have certified physical education specialists; |
ties for enjoyable physical activity. |
appropriate class sizes; and the facilities, equipment, and |
• |
After-school care programs |
that |
supplies needed to deliver quality, daily physical educa- |
provide regular opportunities for |
tion. |
active, physical play. |
3. Publicize and disseminate tools to help schools improve |
• |
Youth sports and recreation pro- |
their physical education and other physical activity |
grams |
that offer a range of develop- |
programs. |
mentally appropriate activities that are |
4. Enable state education and health departments to work |
accessible and attractive to all young |
together to help schools implement quality, daily physical |
people. |
education and other physical activity programs that |
• |
A community structural environ- |
• Have a full-time state coordinator for school physical |
ment |
that makes it easy and safe for |
activity programs. |
young people to walk, ride bicycles, |
• Are part of a coordinated school health program. |
and use close-to-home physical |
• Have support from relevant governmental and non- |
activity facilities. |
governmental organizations. |
• |
Media campaigns |
that help motivate |
5. Enable more after-school care programs to provide |
young people to be physically active. |
regular opportunities for active, physical play. |
6. Help provide access to community sports and recreation |
“This report brings together for the first |
programs for all young people. |
time in one document a comprehensive |
7. Enable youth sports and recreation programs to provide |
agenda for action to promote physical |
coaches and recreation program staff with the training |
activity among young people,” said Lloyd |
they need to offer developmentally appropriate, safe, and |
Kolbe, PhD, Director of CDC’s Division |
enjoyable physical activity experiences for young people. |
of Adolescent and School Health. It |
8. Enable communities to develop and promote the use of |
presents 10 strategies (see “10 Strategies |
safe, well-maintained, and close-to-home sidewalks, |
for Promoting Lifelong Physical Activity”) |
crosswalks, bicycle paths, trails, parks, recreation facilities, |
and a process for facilitating their imple- |
and community designs featuring mixed-use development |
mentation that provide a framework for |
and a connected grid of streets. |
our children “to rediscover the joys of |
9. Implement an ongoing media campaign to promote |
physical activity and to incorporate |
physical education as an important component of a |
physical activity as a fundamental build- |
quality education and long-term health. |
ing-block of their present and future lives.” |
10. Monitor youth physical activity, physical fitness, and |
The major role that schools can play is |
school and community physical activity programs in the |
highlighted in strategies 2 through 4. The |
nation and each state. |
report recommends that schools |
• Provide quality, daily physical educa- |
tion. |
12 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
needed to enjoy a wide variety of |
Percentage of High School Students Who Attended |
physical activity experiences, includ- |
Physical Education Classes Daily, 1991–1999 |
ing competitive and noncompetitive |
activities. |
• Keeping all students active for most of |
the class period. |
• Building students’ confidence in their |
physical abilities. |
• Influencing moral development by |
providing students with opportunities |
to assume leadership, cooperate with |
others, and accept responsibility for |
their own behavior. |
• Having fun. |
In recent years, federal agencies and |
national organizations have developed a |
large number of practical tools that can |
help schools improve their physical educa- |
tion and other physical activity programs. |
However, according to the Secretaries’ |
report, many school administrators and |
Source: CDC, National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. |
educators do not have these materials, and |
only modest efforts have been made to |
• Schedule classroom health education |
disseminate them. These tools are listed on |
that complements and reinforces the |
page 20 of the report, which recommends |
importance of physical education. |
an ongoing marketing initiative to system- |
• Have daily recess periods for elemen- |
atically distribute them to the nation’s |
tary school students with time for |
schools and school districts. The report |
unstructured but supervised play. |
also recommends the provision of staff |
• Offer extracurricular physical activity |
development to ensure effective use of the |
programs—especially enjoyable and |
tools. |
inclusive intramural programs and |
Another important recommendation in |
physical activity clubs (dance, hiking, |
the report is that state education and |
yoga, for example)—that feature diverse |
health departments work together under |
choices for students, meet the needs and |
the leadership of a full-time state coordina- |
interests of all students, and emphasize |
tor for school physical activity programs. |
participation without pressure. |
Full-time coordinators would play an |
The report emphasizes |
quality |
physical |
important role in implementing the |
education classes for all students, from |
essential staff development, resource |
prekindergarten through grade 12, |
ever y |
dissemination, student assessment, moni- |
school day |
because physical education is at |
toring, and evaluation recommendations |
the core of a comprehensive approach to |
made in the Secretaries’ report. Without |
promoting physical activity through |
such a coordinator, according to the |
schools. According to the report, quality |
report, a national initiative to promote |
physical education is not a specific cur- |
physical activity among young people will |
ricula or program; it reflects, instead, an |
inevitably fall through the cracks and fail |
instructional philosophy that emphasizes |
to get the statewide attention needed to |
• Providing intensive instruction in the |
make a difference. |
motor and self-management skills |
cdnr |
13 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Percentage of High School Students |
For further reading... |
Who Were at Risk of Becoming |
or |
* |
Health, United States, 2000 (with Adolescent Health Chart Book |
), |
Were Overweight, |
by Sex, 1999 |
† |
by the National Center for Health Statistics, CDC. Online at |
www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hus/hus.htm |
. |
The Relation of Overweight to Cardiovascular Risk Factors |
Among Children and Adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study, |
by D.S. Freedman, W.H. Dietz, S.R. Srinivasan, and G.S. |
Berenson, in |
Pediatrics |
, Vol. 103, pages 1175–1182 (1999). |
Overweight and Obesity in the United States: Prevalence |
and Trends, 1960–1994, by K.M. Flegal, M.D. Carroll, R.J. |
Kuczmarski, and C.L. Johnson, in the |
International Journal of |
Obesity |
, Vol. 22, No. 1, pages 39–47 (1998). |
Current Estimates of the Economic Cost of Obesity in the |
United States, by A.M. Wolf and G.A. Colditz, in |
Obesity |
Research |
, Vol. 6, No. 2, pages 97–106 (1998). |
Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health |
, b y |
*Students who were |
= |
85 |
percentile but <95 |
t h |
t h |
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Wash- |
percentile for body mass index by age and sex. |
Students who were |
= |
95 |
percentile for body mass |
ington, D.C. (2000). Online at |
www.health.gov/ |
† |
th |
index by age and sex. |
healthypeople/document/tableofcontents.htm |
. |
Source: CDC, Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 1999. |
Full implementation of all the recom- |
tion and Physical Activity. “The vision |
mended strategies will require the commit- |
presented in this report,” he said, “can only |
ment of resources, hard work, and creative |
become a reality when the public and |
thinking from many partners in federal, |
private sectors come together at the na- |
state, and local governments; nongovern- |
tional, state, and local levels to coordinate |
mental organizations; and the private |
and reinforce their efforts.” |
sector. The report further recommends |
Copies of the report can be downloaded |
that a broad, national coalition be devel- |
from the CDC Web site at |
www.cdc.gov/ |
oped to promote better health through |
nccdphp/dash/presphysactrpt |
or re- |
physical activity and sports as an impor- |
quested by mail from Healthy Youth, P.O. |
tant first step in improving the health of |
Box 8817, Silver Spring, MD 20907; by |
our nation’s children and future adults. |
telephone at 888/231-6405; or by E-mail |
This emphasis on the importance of |
at HealthyYouth@cdc.gov. For other |
cooperation among a wide range of partners |
related information, you may contact |
was reinforced by William H. Dietz, MD, |
Howell Wechsler by telephone at 770/488- |
PhD, director of CDC’s Division of Nutri- |
6197 or by E-mail at hwechsler@cdc.gov. |
14 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Reaching and Protecting Young People |
at Risk for HIV Infection |
R |
esearchers studying disease trends |
Americans in the general U.S. population |
note that some subpopulations of |
(about 13%). Seven percent of HIV |
young people in the United States |
infections in people aged 13–24 years have |
appear to be at greater risk for HIV |
been reported among Hispanics and less |
infection than are so-called “mainstream” |
than 1% each among Asians/Pacific |
adolescents. These youth in high-risk |
Islanders and American Indians/Alaska |
situations often have multiple risk factors, |
Natives. In the general U.S. population, |
and many are especially hard to reach with |
Hispanics, Asians/Pacific Islanders, and |
prevention messages and services. Young |
American Indians/Alaska Natives represent |
people in high-risk situations can be |
13%, 4%, and 1%, respectively. Just over |
extremely difficult to find. They may be |
one-third (35%) of HIV infections in this |
sex workers, migrants, or street kids— |
age-group have been reported among |
homeless or runaways—and many are gay, |
whites, who represent nearly three-fourths |
lesbian, bisexual, transgendered, or ques- |
of the U.S. population. |
tioning youth. They also are more likely |
Even though the proportion of AIDS |
than other adolescents to be pregnant, |
cases attributed to heterosexual HIV |
cause a pregnancy, or have HIV and other |
transmission has increased over time, the |
sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). |
largest number of AIDS cases reported |
Young people who live on the streets, |
each year still occur among men who have |
whether by choice or circumstances, often |
sex with men. Young people who are |
find themselves in situations that place |
questioning or experimenting with their |
them at great risk for acquiring HIV |
sexual identity are at great risk for HIV |
infection. These young people may trade |
infection and are among the hardest to |
sex for drugs or money to meet survival |
reach with HIV prevention programs. |
needs; others may share needles to inject |
Young people in the juvenile justice |
drugs. If they live in an area with high |
system also are at high risk for HIV |
HIV prevalence, they will be more likely to |
infection, as well other STDs and hepati- |
encounter an HIV-infected partner than |
tis. Their risk appears to be greater for a |
other young people. |
number of reasons. Some of these young |
Minority youth face similar risks because |
people have used drugs; others have traded |
the proportion of AIDS cases reported |
sex for drugs or to meet basic survival |
each year among people of color has |
needs on the street. They often come from |
grown. Today, in African American com- |
inner-city areas where HIV prevalence is |
munities across the United States, it is not |
greater than in other communities, so their |
uncommon for local officials to declare a |
risk of encountering an infected sex or |
state of emergency in response to the |
needle-sharing partner is higher. |
epidemic. Such actions are backed by |
School health education to prevent |
scientific findings, especially for young |
the spread of HIV infections and AIDS. |
people: Through December 1999, in the |
CDC provides assistance to education |
areas that now report cases of HIV infec- |
departments in all 50 states, 19 major |
tion among adolescents and adults, more |
cities, and 7 U.S. territories to plan, |
than half (56%) of cases in people aged |
establish, and evaluate school health |
13–24 years have occurred among African |
programs to help prevent HIV/AIDS. The |
Americans. This is a much greater propor- |
agency also supports several projects that |
tion than that represented by African |
C |
, |
16 |
O NTINU E D |
PA G E |
cdnr |
15 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Avoiding HIV Infection: CDC’s 1999 HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report |
Editor’s Note: The data in this |
proportion of young women who |
subpopulations have prompted |
summary are from CDC’s |
are infected with HIV—in 1999, |
concerned officials to increase |
HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, |
in areas with confidential HIV |
their efforts to find ways to |
1999, Volume 11, Number 2. |
T |
reporting systems, girls and |
reach young people at highest |
women accounted for almost half |
risk, both in and outside of |
hrough December 1999, |
(49%) of all reported infections in |
school. |
more than 430,000 people |
people between the ages of 13 |
in the United States had died |
CDC works closely with many |
and 24. Even more alarming, girls |
with AIDS (acquired immune |
other public and private part- |
accounted for 64% of all new HIV |
deficiency syndrome). Most of |
ners at all levels to carry out, |
infections reported among |
these deaths (nearly 75%) were |
evaluate, and further develop |
adolescents (13–19 years) in |
among persons under the age |
and strengthen effective HIV |
1999. |
of 45, many of whom were |
prevention efforts nationwide. |
likely infected with human |
CDC uses a comprehensive |
CDC also provides financial and |
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) |
approach to preventing further |
technical support for the follow- |
in their teens and 20s. At least |
spread of HIV and AIDS that |
ing prevention activities: |
half of all new HIV infections in |
incorporates the following broad |
• Disease surveillance. |
this country are believed to |
strategies: |
• HIV antibody counseling, |
occur among people under age |
• Monitoring the epidemic to |
testing, and referral services. |
25. |
target prevention and care |
• Partner counseling and |
With the advent of highly active |
activities. |
referral services. |
antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
• Researching the effectiveness |
• Street and community |
for HIV-infected persons, the |
of prevention methods and |
outreach. |
number of AIDS cases reported |
translating findings for use in |
• Risk-reduction counseling. |
in the United States has de- |
community settings. |
• Prevention case manage- |
clined. However, while young |
• Funding local prevention |
ment. |
people aged 13–24 accounted |
efforts for high-risk commu- |
• Prevention and treatment of |
for only 4% of all AIDS cases |
nities. |
other sexually transmitted |
reported through the end of |
• Fostering linkages with care |
diseases that can increase |
1999, they accounted for 17% of |
and treatment programs. |
risks for HIV transmission. |
the reported HIV cases in areas |
• Public information and |
CDC is an active participant in |
with confidential HIV infection |
education. |
helping young people avoid HIV |
reporting (not all U.S. states |
• School-based education on |
infection. By providing funding |
currently report cases of HIV |
AIDS. |
and technical support, the divi- |
infection, including some states |
• International research |
sion assists national, state, and |
with high rates of AIDS). |
studies. |
local education agencies and |
• Technology transfer systems. |
Scientists believe that cases of |
other organizations that address |
• Organizational capacity |
new HIV infection diagnosed |
adolescent health in identifying |
building. |
among 13–24-year-olds probably |
and preventing HIV risk behav- |
• Program-relevant epidemio- |
are indicative of overall trends in |
iors. |
logic, sociobehavioral, and |
HIV incidence (the number of |
Collaborative efforts first |
evaluation research. |
new infections in a given time |
concentrated on HIV prevention |
period, usually a year) because |
More data is available online at |
education within the compre- |
people in this age-range have |
www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap.htm. |
hensive school health education |
more recently initiated high-risk |
program. Today, increasing |
behaviors. A disturbing finding in |
infection rates in many youth |
this age-group is the growing |
16 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
important to try to understand the |
Reaching and Protecting Young People |
at Risk for HIV Infection |
adolescent’s particular situation.” Dr. |
C |
14 |
Robin believes that providers of services |
O NTINU E D |
F R O M |
PA G E |
for young people in high-risk situations |
train teams from these states, cities, and |
need to know that it is important not to |
territories to continuously improve HIV |
make assumptions about behaviors. For |
prevention programs. The major strategies |
example, primary care providers may not |
that education agencies employ include |
realize that young women who self-identify |
implementing HIV prevention policies, |
as lesbian need information about birth |
conducting staff development programs, |
control; a recent study revealed that they |
incorporating HIV prevention lessons and |
were more likely than other young women |
activities into the school’s formal and |
to have had a pregnancy. |
informal curriculum, and developing |
Another obstacle to providing needed |
targeted programs that address the needs |
services is that many of these young people |
of youth in high-risk situations. To assist |
are difficult to find. “Where you find them |
with the policy and resource development, |
depends on the context,” said Dr. Robin. |
as well as the training of professional staff, |
For example, there was a high rate of |
CDC funds approximately 40 national |
homelessness in New York in the early |
organizations representing professional |
1990s, and many shelters viewed adoles- |
staff in health, education, or youth-serving |
cents as troublemakers and sent them to |
organizations that promote HIV preven- |
other locations. This often caused families |
tion programming in school or commu- |
to be divided by age groups. Some of these |
nity sites. In addition, funding is provided |
families never reunited, and many young |
to eight national organizations that are |
people ended up on the street. |
helping postsecondary institutions set up a |
Many community-based organizations |
national system of integrated activities to |
serve runaway and homeless youth. Most |
prevent HIV/AIDS and other serious |
of these groups have outreach programs to |
health problems among students in our |
help locate young people in need of |
nation’s colleges and universities. |
services. Some street youth go to public |
What do we know about young |
health clinics for medical care, but these |
people in high-risk situations? |
At a |
clinics are unable to do enough, and many |
November 1990 meeting, the CDC |
young people receive no medical services at |
Advisory Committee on the Prevention of |
all. Alternative schools are another location |
HIV Infection characterized young people |
where young people at risk can be found— |
in high-risk situations as feeling invulner- |
some of these schools serve targeted youth |
able, lacking adult supervision, having a |
populations such as pregnant adolescents |
history of abuse, feeling distrustful of |
and teen mothers, young people from the |
adults, and being disenfranchised from the |
juvenile justice system, those who would |
usual institutions that could offer them |
not otherwise graduate, or gay or lesbian |
help (schools, for instance). Attendees at |
youth. Young people who are incarcerated |
that meeting concluded that prevention |
have recently become a focus of more |
programs focusing on this group may not |
intensive prevention efforts. |
succeed unless attention is first given to |
In many of the places where young |
meeting their basic needs. |
people in high-risk situations are found, |
“You can never really generalize about |
critically needed HIV prevention and |
youth in high-risk situations,” said Leah |
other social and health services may be |
Robin, PhD, a CDC health scientist. “We |
provided. Alternative schools serving |
use labels like gay or lesbian or ‘young men |
young women who are pregnant or have |
who have sex with men’ because we are |
small children, for example, can provide |
interested in their risk behaviors, but it is |
assistance with child care and nutrition. |
cdnr |
17 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Other activities, called “resiliency-based” |
years with a |
Juvenile Justice Work Group |
programs, do not focus specifically on risk |
(JJWG) made up of representatives from |
behaviors, but help young people develop |
the CCCWG, the federal Office of Juve- |
their strengths. These programs teach |
nile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, |
young people problem-solving skills and |
several key juvenile justice organizations, |
help them form attachments to caring |
and grantees (ETR Associates and the |
adults and their communities. Such |
National Commission on Correctional |
activities enhance the development of |
Health Care) who are funded to provide |
healthy relationships and promote self- |
training in HIV prevention strategies to |
efficacy and hopefulness for the future. |
juvenile justice staff around the country. |
“Most programs for nonmainstream |
The JJWG has met several times since |
kids have not been evaluated,” Dr. Robin |
its inception and currently is working to |
said, “so we don’t really know yet which |
develop a series of workshops to be offered |
are most likely to succeed.” For example, a |
to state teams in 2002. The purpose of the |
current study includes a component |
upcoming training is to strengthen col- |
designed to help students in alternative |
laboration between public health and |
schools learn to be useful by performing |
juvenile justice organizations to prevent |
community service, but it is unclear at this |
and treat HIV, STDs, and hepatitis among |
time how such programs will affect HIV |
young people in the juvenile justice system |
risk in this population. Dr. Robin also is |
and to ensure continuity of prevention and |
helping to evaluate an HIV prevention |
care efforts in the communities to which |
program, called |
Power Moves |
, for institu- |
they return. |
tional placements of all kinds. In this |
“Historically, the public health system |
study, researchers are working with 337 |
and the juvenile justice system have had |
participants aged 12–19 years who were |
competing priorities and different mis- |
incarcerated at a juvenile justice facility in |
sions,” said Jim Martindale, MSW, a CDC |
Colorado. The HIV prevention lessons |
health education specialist. “The top |
used in this |
Power Moves |
program are |
priority for a public health agency is |
designed to stand alone because young |
preventing health problems, but the top |
people in the justice system tend to be |
priority for any correctional facility is |
moved around a lot between institutions, |
security. We know that young people in |
or be pulled out of classes due to changes |
the juvenile justice system are at high risk |
in facility schedules. Lessons learned from |
in terms of health issues, and there are |
such evaluation studies will be shared with |
great unrealized opportunities to reach |
CDC constituents who work with incar- |
them through comprehensive and better |
cerated young people. |
coordinated public health practices in |
In the juvenile justice system, according |
these settings. When public health and |
to Dr. Robin, “we usually try to intervene |
juvenile justice are working well together, |
with a narrowly defined group, and what |
there is a respect for each other’s missions.” |
we can do varies from state to state. For |
Public health services that may be offered |
these kids,” she said, “it may be our last |
in correctional settings range from group |
chance to intervene.” |
education or individual counseling on |
To help meet the health-related needs of |
HIV/STD prevention, to clinical services |
incarcerated young people, CDC’s |
Cross- |
such as STD screening or HIV testing and |
Center Corrections Work Group |
counseling, to ensuring continuity of care |
(CCCWG) included a juvenile justice |
in the community for those who are |
portion in a series of 1-day in-service |
released. |
trainings sponsored by the CCCWG for |
HIV prevention activities focusing on |
CDC staff members last year. In addition, |
the juvenile justice system are just one |
CDC has been working over the last 2 |
example of the many programs that CDC |
18 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
coordinates to help slow the spread of HIV |
Constituents funded to provide program- |
and AIDS among young people. |
ming to targeted populations are asked to |
Programs for young people at greatest |
work collaboratively. The expertise of these |
risk for HIV infection |
. |
CDC assists a |
funded constituents is then used to pro- |
number of agencies that serve areas with |
vide professional development opportuni- |
high HIV prevalence in coordinating |
ties for teams from funded state and local |
activities to reach young people at high |
education constituents and key commu- |
risk, including minority youth, indigent |
nity members who can assist them and |
youth, or young people in difficult life |
advocate for HIV prevention in the |
situations—for example, runaways, men |
respective target populations. Constituents |
who have sex with men, recent immi- |
and their community advocates work |
grants, and those who are homeless, |
together to develop action plans for the |
incarcerated, pregnant, or in need of drug |
targeted population. CDC project officers |
or alcohol rehabilitation. The division also |
provide technical assistance to help funded |
supports many projects across the country |
constituents implement the prevention |
that are designed to assist professional |
plans in their communities. This process is |
educators, health professionals, parents, |
repeated continuously as new information |
and organizations that serve minority |
about the most effective programs becomes |
populations and young people who are not |
available. |
in school to establish effective programs to |
For further information about CDC |
prevent the spread of HIV infection and |
programs to prevent HIV infection among |
AIDS. |
young people, visit the Web sites at |
“CDC is systematically promoting |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash |
or |
collaborative programming among agen- |
www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap.htm |
. |
cies in order to reach youth at high risk,” |
CDC has released its new HIV preven- |
said CDC health scientist Diane |
tion and control plan, |
HIV Strategic Plan |
Allensworth, PhD. These programs, she |
Through 2005 |
, which can be viewed online |
said, follow a pattern established for all |
at |
www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/news/ |
target groups. A work group conducts |
prevention.pdf. |
internal staff development activities. |
Asthma: 10 Million School Days Lost |
Each Year |
Asthma, a chronic condition that is |
added, is the impact of asthma on minor- |
triggered by allergens or irritants in the |
ity children. Death from asthma is 2 to 6 |
environment, is a major health problem of |
times more likely among African Ameri- |
increasing concern in the United States. |
cans than in the general population. |
Between 1980 and 1994, the prevalence of |
CDC has launched a pilot effort involv- |
asthma increased 75% overall and 74% |
ing four local education agencies serving |
among children 5 to 14 years of age. |
large, urban school districts and capable of |
“Today asthma affects 15 million people, |
targeting racial or ethnic minority groups. |
including nearly 5 million under the age of |
An asthma wellness manual is in develop- |
18, and it accounts for an estimated 10 |
ment and will become available in about |
million lost school days annually,” said |
16 months. In the interim, a helpful |
CDC health scientist Mary Vernon-Smiley, |
MD, MPH. Of special concern, she |
C |
, |
23 |
O NTI NU E D |
P AG E |
cdnr |
19 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Michigan Gets Moving With Exemplary |
Physical Education Curriculum |
W |
hen Michigan Governor John |
EPEC has sound scientific grounding in |
Engler took up the problem of |
chronic disease prevention and uses state- |
obesity in the state, he found |
of-the-art educational theory. The result is |
himself confronting a dilemma familiar to |
an exciting curriculum for grades K–5 and |
policymakers. Although school physical |
6–8 that equips students to understand the |
education (PE) programs were clearly part |
importance of physical activity and to |
of the solution, classes in PE and health |
obtain the fitness, knowledge, motor skills, |
were being squeezed out of the curriculum |
and personal and social skills they need to |
by competing demands. Furthermore, he |
be active for life. “What EPEC gives |
hesitated to mandate time for PE until an |
children is the alphabet of movement on |
effective program was available. He resolved |
which they can build a lifetime of physical |
the dilemma by founding the Michigan |
activity,” said Glenna DeJong, PhD, |
Governor’s Council on Physical Fitness, |
Director of Educational Programs for the |
Health and Sports and charging it to |
Governor’s Council. |
develop a curriculum that would help |
EPEC breaks with traditional ap- |
schools to equip children with the knowl- |
proaches and teaches toward specific, |
edge, skills, and motivation necessary to live |
highly valued objectives in a systematic |
a physically active lifestyle now and as |
way to create lasting change. Instruction |
adults. The result is the Exemplary Physical |
based on clearly stated outcomes is at the |
Education Curriculum (EPEC), a public |
heart of the EPEC mission. |
health initiative that addresses the crushing |
“Programs that give students the knowl- |
burden of chronic disease attributable to |
edge, attitudes, motor skills, joy, and |
physical inactivity. EPEC is being carried |
confidence to participate in physical |
out completely in the education arena. |
activity may help young people establish |
“Improved levels of physical activity |
active lifestyles that continue throughout |
represent a crucial step toward the preven- |
their lives,” said Lloyd Kolbe, PhD, |
tion and reduction of a number of chronic |
director of CDC’s Division of Adolescent |
diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, and |
and School Health. EPEC lessons promote |
cardiovascular disease. The Michigan |
lifelong physical activity by providing |
efforts are an important step in this |
developmentally appropriate instruction |
direction,” said William H. Dietz, MD, |
that is perceived to be valuable in develop- |
PhD, Director, Division of Nutrition and |
ing students’ knowledge and mastery of |
Physical Activity, NCCDPHP, CDC. |
motor, behavioral, and fitness skills. Dr. |
The Michigan Fitness Foundation |
DeJong said the response from teachers has |
provides funding and staff to carry out the |
been “fantastic. In approximately 2 years, |
initiatives of the Governor’s Council. The |
we’ve reached 53% of our Michigan |
Council and Foundation Boards comprise |
market and trained more than 900 teach- |
educators, physicians, policymakers, |
ers.” EPEC materials have been praised for |
business owners, and other professionals |
their effectiveness, ease of use, and clear |
from the field of health and sports. Collec- |
learning objectives. |
tively, they are working in an innovative |
Other states that wish to provide quality |
way to make systemic change, reverse the |
physical education programs are looking to |
trend toward sedentary living, and posi- |
EPEC as a solution. Hawaii, Indiana, |
tively affect many risk factors for serious |
Ohio, and New York have all shown great |
health problems. |
|
20 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
interest in adopting EPEC for their |
EPEC students had better scores on a field |
schools. |
test of physical fitness and better self- |
In 1997, 100 elementary school physical |
reported personal/social behaviors than |
education teachers taught and evaluated |
non-EPEC students. |
the EPEC K–2 lessons. More than 95% of |
EPEC offers Michigan the potential to |
the teachers found the EPEC lessons to be |
improve the health of nearly 1.7 million |
clearly written, easy to communicate and |
school children each year. In addition to |
implement, and developmentally appropri- |
the curricula for grades K–5 and 6–8, |
ate. |
materials are being prepared for use in |
Other study findings show that EPEC is |
high schools. For more information on |
effective. Two of nine factors investigated |
EPEC, the Governor’s Council on Physical |
contributed significantly to school differ- |
Fitness, Health and Sports, or the Michi- |
ences in student performance: whether the |
gan Fitness Foundation, please call Glenna |
teacher was certified with a major in |
DeJong at 800/434-8642 or visit the Web |
physical education and whether the |
site at |
www.michiganfitness.org |
. |
teacher used EPEC lessons. In addition, |
Utah Takes a Unique Approach |
to School Health |
schools to participate in the Olympic spirit |
by making their school and community a |
healthier place. |
Schools will be given a menu of criteria |
to implement that will qualify them for |
gold, silver, or bronze medal school |
awards. CDC health indicators for envi- |
ronmental and policy supports for schools |
were the basis for the criteria (see “Gold |
Medal School Project”p. 21). The state |
W |
health department worked with the state |
Office of Education and others to decide |
Utah students enjoy a |
ith schools under tremendous |
which criteria were the most important |
Gold Medal break: a |
pressure to increase standard- |
and the most doable. “Using the criteria |
walk outdoors. |
ized test scores, motivating |
gives schools credit for what they have |
schools to adopt environmental and policy |
already accomplished,” explained Joan |
changes to improve health is a constant |
Ware, MSPH, Director, Cardiovascular |
challenge for public health professionals. |
Health Program, Utah Department of |
Utah’s Department of Health is meeting |
Health. |
this challenge by linking school health |
“We’re very impressed with the program |
with the biggest event to hit the state in |
because it’s taking a creative, innovative |
decades: the 2002 Winter Olympics. The |
approach to letting schools know about |
department is implementing the Gold |
the most important policies and practices |
Medal Schools Project to encourage |
students and faculty in Utah elementary |
C |
, |
25 |
O NTI NU E D |
P AG E |
cdnr |
21 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Gold Medal School |
A Healthier You 2002 Moves Utahans |
Project Guides |
to Physical Activity |
Policies to Promote |
T |
he Gold Medal School Project is part of a larger effort |
Health |
to inspire Utah to catch the Olympic spirit. A Healthier |
T |
You 2002™ provides information, opportunities for partici- |
pation, and motivation to begin and maintain healthy habits |
in schools, communities, and worksites. Physicians and |
he Gold Medal School Project |
health care providers were given prescription pads to |
assists schools in creating an |
encourage them to prescribe physical activity for their |
environment that promotes healthy |
patients. Thirty-seven communities have conducted a Gold |
lifestyle choices for both students and |
Medal Mile Event, 1-mile walks designed to encourage |
teachers. Schools are given a menu of |
Utahans to become more active. Participants who complete |
criteria to implement that will qualify |
the event receive the Gold Medal Olympic commemorative |
them for gold, silver, or bronze medal |
pin (valued at $20), which is available only to participants. |
school awards. |
“We wanted to let people know how healthy it would be to |
Sample criteria for Gold Medal Schools: |
walk a mile and that they could do it,” said Scott Williams, |
• Establish a tobacco- and drug-free |
MD, MPH, Deputy Director, Utah Department of Health. |
policy, and ensure awareness of the |
“We wanted them to see how short a mile really is.” The |
policy among faculty and students. |
project also involves the construction of permanent Gold |
• Establish a policy that discourages |
Medal Mile courses. CDC has provided funding for 20 |
withholding physical education or |
courses; the state plans a total of 30. The courses must be |
recess as a punishment. |
accessible to the elderly and disabled. |
• Establish a policy that requires |
More than 50% of Utah’s population is overweight or |
classroom instruction on nutrition, |
obese. Despite having the lowest rate of cardiovascular |
and ensure faculty awareness of this |
disease and smoking in the nation, Utahans spend $342 |
policy. |
million annually on hospital stays. A Healthier You 2002™ |
• Establish a policy that provides an |
uses the Olympic legacy of athletic health and fitness to |
adequate amount of time for students |
improve and motivate Utahans to embrace a life of health |
to eat school meals—at least 10 |
and wellness. The initiative promotes five sets of behaviors: |
minutes for breakfast and 20 minutes |
for lunch from the time students are |
1. Physical Activity: 30 minutes of any type of physical |
seated. |
activity 3–5 days per week. |
• Establish a faculty and staff wellness |
2. Nutrition: Lower dietary fat and increase fruit and veg- |
program, and ensure faculty awareness |
etable consumption. |
of this policy. |
3. Healthy Behaviors: Quitting tobacco use and low-risk |
• Establish a policy that elementary |
alcohol use. |
students will participate in at least 90 |
4. Safety: Regular seat belt and helmet use (for future |
minutes of structured physical activity |
implementation). |
each week, and ensure student and |
5. Prevention: Getting all recommended early detection |
faculty awareness of the policy. |
screening such as Papanicolau (Pap) tests, mammograms, |
and blood pressure checks, as well as immunizations. |
|
22 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Healthier Smiles: States Focus on Children’s |
Oral Health |
A |
lthough |
health programs (CSHPs) funded by CDC. |
great |
Activities for the initial planning year |
strides |
included assessing children’s oral health |
have been made in |
status in the respective states and forming |
preventive oral |
oral health coalitions with broad representa- |
health since mid- |
tion from the state education agency, health |
century, many |
department, school administration and |
children continue |
staff, child advocates, foundations, nongov- |
to be at risk for |
ernmental organizations, and other part- |
dental decay, one |
ners. In FY 1999, these three states as well |
of the most common chronic infectious |
as South Carolina were awarded 3-year |
diseases. Nearly 80% of children have had |
cooperative agreements to implement the |
at least one cavity by the time they are 17 |
approaches selected. In FY 2000, another |
years old. Poor and under-served children |
state, Maine, received a 2-year cooperative |
aged 2–9 years have twice as much |
agreement under this initiative. |
untreated dental decay as other children. |
During the initial planning year, most of |
Permanent first molars that erupt at about |
these states conducted surveys of school |
age 6 are most susceptible to decay. |
administrators, school nurses, and health |
Dental sealants, a plastic coating placed |
educators to assess the level of school-based |
into the pits and grooves of molar teeth, |
oral health programs, determine how |
are a cost-effective and proven prevention |
schools identified and dealt with children |
method, but only 23% of 8-year-olds— |
who needed dental care, and examine |
only 3% among poor 8-year-olds—have |
current policies governing school-based oral |
had their first molars sealed. Children of |
health delivery systems. These surveys |
some ethnic and racial groups, such as |
revealed the need for enhanced oral health |
Mexican Americans and African Ameri- |
education and screening in schools. For |
cans, may experience even greater dispari- |
example, a survey of elementary school |
ties in untreated tooth decay and sealant |
nurses conducted in Ohio found that 10% |
use, and often have less access to dental |
of students had dental problems serious |
care. |
enough to affect a student’s attendance and |
One strategy for reaching these and |
ability to learn. In addition, only half of |
other at-risk children is through school- |
those students referred for care actually |
based programs that support linkages |
receive the needed dental treatment. In |
with health care professionals and other |
Rhode Island, only 18% of public schools |
dental partners in the community. In FY |
and 8% of private schools currently had |
1998, CDC awarded cooperative agree- |
oral health promotion programs. And in |
ments to education agencies in three |
South Carolina, 59% of the lead health |
states—Ohio, Rhode Island, and Wiscon- |
educators surveyed reported that not |
sin—to develop models for school-based |
enough emphasis was being placed on oral |
programs to improve access to oral health |
health topics in the school curriculum. |
education, prevention, and treatment |
After their initial planning year, the four |
services for school-aged children. This |
current grantee states are using various |
effort builds on the coordinated school |
approaches to improve the oral health of |
|
cdnr |
23 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
their school children. For example, the |
oral health care services. |
“Healthy Smiles for Wisconsin” program |
The South Carolina Healthy Schools |
for children is focusing on increasing |
Oral Health Care Program has formed a |
sealant use, oral health education, and |
Children’s Oral Health Coalition, with |
youth oral health surveillance. The kick-off |
representation from school districts, school |
for the program, held in the rotunda of the |
nurses, state dental and dental hygiene |
state capitol in Madison before an audi- |
societies, the state’s dental school, success- |
ence that included then-Wisconsin Gover- |
ful oral health programs, and state agen- |
nor Tommy G. Thompson (now Secretary |
cies. During the program’s first year, the |
of Health and Human Services), state |
group identified a particular need in that |
lawmakers, and legislative staff, was a |
state for enhanced training on general oral |
demonstration of dentists and dental |
health education for school nurses. In |
hygienists applying sealants to school |
addition to supporting these training |
children’s molars. As part of the Healthy |
seminars, the project is developing and |
Smiles program, five projects are directed |
testing a classroom oral health curriculum |
toward the urban poor in Milwaukee, and |
for grades 3, 4, and 5. |
others are being implemented widely in all |
The newest grantee, Maine, is working |
regions of the state. More information on |
to strengthen linkages between the state |
this program is available on the program’s |
departments of education and health and |
Web site, |
www.healthysmilesforwi.org |
. |
to develop a multidisciplinary statewide |
The Rhode Island initiative “Healthy |
steering committee to address oral health |
Schools! Healthy Kids!” is focusing on |
issues, including increased coordination of |
school- and community-based services, |
school sealant programs. |
family outreach and education, and oral |
An evaluation tool for these projects is |
health education and policies for schools. |
currently being designed and will be |
A unique result of this project, which |
implemented during FY 2001. |
currently is being implemented in poor |
“The goal of these programs is to |
urban neighborhoods in Providence, |
develop comprehensive, integrated, and |
involves changes in state policies that |
sustainable approaches to address the oral |
regulate how mandated oral health screen- |
health needs of school-aged children in the |
ings are performed. In one of the pro- |
United States,” said William R. Maas, |
gram’s pilot projects, children requiring |
DDS, MPH, Director, Division of Oral |
dental services are assigned a caseworker |
Health, NCCDPHP, CDC. “These |
who is responsible for linking the child |
models will provide information about |
and family with appropriate services (e.g., |
different school-based or school-linked |
Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insur- |
approaches and serve as guides for those |
ance Program) and for finding the child a |
states that are developing programs target- |
“dental home.” The child, as well as family |
ing oral health for vulnerable children.” |
members, subsequently will be referred for |
Asthma: 10 Million School Days Lost |
Each Year |
C |
18 |
O NTINU E D |
F R O M |
PA G E |
resource is the Environmental Protection |
ment |
(Publication EPA 402-K-00-003; to |
Agency’s publication, |
IAQ Tools for Schools: |
view online or to order, go to |
Managing Asthma in the School Environ- |
www.epa.gov/iaq/schools/incentiv.html |
). |
24 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Study Will Strengthen School Health |
Policies and Programs |
I |
n fall 2001, CDC will release data |
for students? What policies are in |
from the School Health Policies and |
place to maintain students’ health |
Programs Study (SHPPS), providing a |
records? What types of health services |
T |
detailed look at school health activities at |
are available to students at the school |
he School |
the state, district, school, and classroom |
and through arrangements with |
levels nationwide. The data were collected |
providers in the community? How |
Health Policies |
in spring 2000 and will be used to improve |
much time do school nurses and other |
and Programs |
school health policies and programs |
health services personnel spend at the |
Study (SHPPS) is |
throughout the United States. |
school? |
the largest |
“This is the largest assessment of school |
• |
Mental health and social services. |
assessment of |
health programs ever undertaken,” said |
What types of mental health or social |
school health |
Laura Kann, PhD, Chief of the Surveil- |
services are available to students at the |
programs ever |
lance and Evaluation Research Branch, |
school and through arrangements |
undertaken. |
Division of Adolescent and School Health, |
with providers in the community? |
NCCDPHP. “SHPPS 2000 is a bigger and |
What is the required ratio of students |
better version of the survey we did in |
to mental health or social services |
1994. This time, we’re covering all eight |
staff? What credentials and certifica- |
components of school health programs at |
tions are required of school guidance |
the elementary, middle/junior high, and |
counselors, school psychologists, and |
senior high school levels. SHPPS 2000 |
school social workers? |
data will be used to measure eight |
Healthy |
• |
School policy and environment. |
People 2010 |
objectives,” she noted. Follow- |
What policies are in place regarding |
ing are the eight components and examples |
fighting, weapon possession, gang |
of topics covered. |
activities, harassment, and use of |
• |
Health education. |
What are students |
tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs? |
being taught about health, and how |
What policies are in place to promote |
many hours of instruction are re- |
school safety and prevent injuries? |
quired? What materials and methods |
• |
Food service. |
Are schools offering |
do teachers use to teach health |
breakfast and lunch to children? What |
education? What kinds of health |
variety of foods are offered? Do states |
education goals and objectives are |
and districts have any policies on junk |
states and school districts setting for |
food? Are school meals in compliance |
schools? |
with the U.S. Dietary Guidelines for |
• |
Physical education and activity. |
Americans? Is staff development |
What is being taught to students |
provided to food service personnel? |
during physical education? How many |
• |
Faculty and staff health promotion. |
hours of instruction are required? |
Are health or mental health services |
What types of facilities are available for |
provided to school faculty and staff? |
physical education classes and for |
Are employee assistance programs or |
community use? What credentials and |
wellness workshops offered? What |
certifications are required of physical |
about health screenings and physical |
education teachers? |
activity programs? |
• |
Health services. |
What health screen- |
• |
Family and community involve- |
ings and immunizations are required |
ment. |
How are students, parents, |
cdnr |
25 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
guardians, and community members |
views with principals, health education |
contributing to school health policies? |
teachers, physical education teachers, food |
Are faculty and staff collaborating |
service directors, nurses, counselors, and |
with community agencies on school |
other personnel in a nationally representa- |
health education, physical education, |
tive sample of elementary, middle/junior |
and nutrition projects? Are schools |
high, and senior high schools. Students |
promoting community awareness of |
were not inter viewed. The next SHPPS |
their health, physical education, food |
probably will be conducted in 2006, |
service, and mental health and social |
according to Dr. Kann. |
services programs? |
For more information about SHPPS, |
contact Nancy Brener, PhD; Surveillance |
The SHPPS data were collected for |
and Evaluation Research Branch, DASH, |
CDC by Research Triangle Institute of |
NCCDPHP, Mail Stop K–33; CDC; 4770 |
North Carolina. Surveys were mailed to all |
Buford Hwy.; Atlanta, GA 30341-3717; |
states and to a nationally representative |
telephone 770/488-6184; E-mail |
sample of school districts to find out about |
nad1@cdc.gov. Information also is avail- |
their school health policies for children in |
able at |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/ |
kindergarten through 12th grade. Data |
shpps |
. |
also were gathered during on-site inter- |
Utah Takes a Unique Approach |
to School Health |
C |
19 |
O NTINU E D |
F R O M |
PA G E |
they can implement to promote physical |
physical education. The goal is to get all |
activity and good nutrition,” said Howell |
500 Utah elementary schools, public and |
Wechsler, EdD, MPH, a health scientist in |
private, working toward some kind of |
CDC’s Division of Adolescent and School |
award. |
Health. |
The school administration will be |
Having the three levels of excellence |
charged with observing whether policies |
allows schools to set their own goals for the |
on nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco |
project. The bronze level is the most basic; |
are being followed. The program won’t go |
at the gold and silver levels, additional |
away after the Olympics, Ms. Ware |
criteria must be met. Schools will receive |
promised. Other plans for Utah’s school |
an award of $500 for physical activity |
children include soccer leagues that play |
equipment if the criteria are achieved. |
during school lunch, and structured |
Mentoring packets will be provided to help |
hopscotch and jump-rope activities. |
schools find resources, and schools will be |
For more information on the Gold |
given access to college students majoring |
Medal School Project, contact Karen |
in physical education to help them figure |
Coats, telephone 801/538-6227, E-mail |
out how to meet the criteria related to |
kcoats@doh.state.ut.us. |
|
26 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
How States Are Using YRBSS Data to |
Improve the Health of Teenagers |
A |
decade ago, |
Mr. Campana noted. |
Another YRBSS success story involved |
public |
health and |
tobacco use. “We looked at our YRBSS |
data and saw that smoking rates had gone |
education officials |
had mostly |
up steadily from 1991 through 1995. So |
we established an early intervention |
anecdotal evidence |
of the health threats |
program in 1996. We’ve since had a 20% |
drop in substance abuse on campus, as |
facing teenagers. |
Today, the Youth |
reported by the YRBSS, and a 20% drop |
in suspensions for students using or posses- |
Risk Behavior |
Surveillance System |
sing tobacco or marijuana or alcohol,” Mr. |
Campana said. |
(YRBSS) provides a |
much clearer |
Until San Diego began participating in |
the YRBSS, “we had no sur veillance data |
picture of teenagers’ |
health behaviors, |
to see what the extent of high-risk behav- |
ior was among adolescents,” he said. |
both good and bad |
(“YRBS Data for |
“Now, the YRBSS data give us a much |
more accurate account of where they’re at, |
1990s,” p. 30). |
“We’re 10 years into |
and it gives us the opportunity to cross- |
reference behaviors. For example, what |
the YRBSS now, |
and the real proof |
other risk behaviors do binge drinkers |
of its worth is in |
have? We looked at the data and found |
that binge drinkers were less likely than |
how the data are being used,” said Laura |
The Youth Risk |
other students to use seat belts or con- |
Kann, PhD, a CDC health survey research |
Behavior Surveillance |
doms. Suicide attempts were about the |
System tracks health |
specialist who oversees the YRBSS. |
risk behaviors in |
same, but in all other categories, binge |
“In San Diego, we share the YRBSS data |
children and |
drinkers were more likely to exhibit high- |
between health agencies, community |
adolescents. |
risk behaviors.” |
agencies, and schools to help with program |
development and planning; to show where |
Focus on What’s Needed Most |
our greatest needs are and justify requests |
for grants; and to see where we are in |
Montana has participated in the YRBSS |
relation to other districts, states, and the |
since 1991, and “our biggest hot issue |
nation,” said Jack Campana, MEd, direc- |
right now is tobacco,” noted Richard |
tor of Health and Intervention Services for |
Chiotti, Director, Coordinated School |
the San Diego Unified School District. |
Health Programs, Montana Office of |
When San Diego’s YRBSS data revealed |
Public Instruction. But funding for |
that suicide attempts among adolescents |
interventions should be driven by need |
had increased dramatically, education and |
and not hot issues, he said. “Say a school |
public health officials used the data as |
district has a rate of tobacco use that’s |
evidence of the urgent need for interven- |
below the national rate, but their violence |
tions. “Because of the YRBSS data, |
indicators far exceeded the national rate. |
$2 million was provided for after-school |
We can use the data to really focus on |
programs to keep children active during |
what’s needed most—in this example, that |
some of the most critical hours when high- |
would be violence prevention.” |
risk behaviors are most likely to occur,” |
cdnr |
27 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
The YRBSS data also can be used to |
health education programs, one size does |
design a program to meet a need that is |
not fit all,” said Laurie Bechhofer, MPH, |
specific to a school, Mr. Chiotti said. “One |
HIV/STD Prevention Consultant, Michi- |
of our schools had a significant problem |
gan Department of Education, Lansing, |
with marijuana use, and school officials |
Michigan. “The data showed that about |
used YRBSS data to make their case when |
half of students in regular high schools had |
requesting support from the Safe and |
ever had sex [in 1997], compared with |
Drug-Free School’s Greatest Needs grant |
about 90% of high school students in |
funds, which we provide to schools. The |
alternative education programs [in 1998].” |
school then used the money to develop a |
Recognizing the urgent need to help |
campaign for marijuana use prevention |
students in alternative schools, the state |
and social norms marketing,” he said. |
education and health departments held |
Social marketing campaigns and the |
several forums for educators and policy- |
YRBSS go hand in hand, Mr. Chiotti |
makers, “and we used the YRBSS data as a |
added. The data from Youth Risk Behavior |
springboard to get people thinking about |
Surveys show teenagers “that not all of |
what are the risks and needs of these |
their peers are out there having sex, |
students,” Ms. Bechhofer said. State |
drinking, or using other drugs—not nearly |
officials gave attendees a YRBSS chart |
as much as kids or their parents think. The |
showing that students in alternative high |
norm is to not be involved in risk behav- |
schools are far more likely than students in |
iors, and once kids find this out, some of |
regular high schools to drink and drive, |
the pressure is removed for them to have |
carry a weapon, fight, attempt suicide, |
sex, smoke marijuana, drink, or practice |
smoke, use illegal drugs, and have four or |
these other behaviors,” he explained. |
more sexual partners. |
YRBSS data are also helping to dispel |
When they saw how Michigan schools |
myths about school violence. “You hear |
compared with schools nationwide, some |
about Columbine, and it’s very sad,” said |
attendees were surprised. “Everyone likes |
Mr. Chiotti, “but if you look at schools |
to think their community looks different |
nationwide, they’re very safe.” About 6 |
from the state and that their state looks |
years ago, Montana changed the name of |
different from the nation. The YRBSS data |
its Drug-Free Schools Program to the Safe |
showed us that we are not that different in |
and Drug-Free Schools Program. “We |
many of the categories of risk behaviors, and |
wanted schools to look at fighting, both on |
that was a surprise,” said Ms. Bechhofer. |
and off school property, as an indicator for |
Michigan officials are trying a new |
violence, and to also look at conflict |
approach this year to disperse state YRBSS |
resolution and character development |
findings to an even broader audience. |
issues,” he explained. “Montana schools |
They are hosting a series of monthly lunch |
and other schools across the country are |
meetings, each focusing on a particular |
making a sincere and dedicated effort to |
health threat facing adolescents and each |
reduce violence in schools, and the YRBSS |
geared to reach a different group of |
is helping us do this.” |
professionals. “For the lunch meeting |
about nutrition in January 2001, we |
One Size Does Not Fit All |
invited people from the Dairy Council, |
team nutritionists, food service staff, |
In Michigan, the 1998 National Alterna- |
representatives of voluntary agencies, |
tive High School Youth Risk Behavior |
health department people, epidemiologists, |
Survey has provided strong evidence of the |
and program people,” Ms. Bechhofer |
need for health education programs |
explained. Attendees reviewed YRBSS data |
tailored to help students in the state’s |
on nutrition issues and discussed what is |
alternative schools. “The national data |
being done to address the nutritional needs |
were powerful in making the case that with |
28 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
the state to print and distribute thousands |
Facts About the YRBSS |
of copies of its YRBSS reports. The state |
prints 5,000 copies of its YRBSS summary |
• Has four components: state and large city school-based |
report alone and also produces specialized |
surveys of students in grades 9–12; national school-based |
reports that present data separately for |
surveys of students in grades 9–12; a national household |
students in grades 7–8 and 9–12 and for |
survey of young people 12–21 years old; and a national |
subgroups, including American Indians |
mail survey of college students in 2- and 4-year institu- |
attending schools on the reservation, those |
tions. |
attending schools off the reservation, |
• First conducted in 1990 and conducted every other year |
students in alternative schools, and stu- |
since 1991. |
dents in special education programs. |
• Monitors six categories of risk among adolescents: vio- |
“We also have a Web site that allows you |
lence and unintentional injury, tobacco use, alcohol and |
to view state-level response percentages for |
other drug use, sexual behaviors, dietary behaviors, and |
every survey question ever asked during |
physical activity. |
the 1991, 1993, 1995, 1997, and 1999 |
• Is linked to 16 of the |
Healthy People 2010 |
objectives and |
Youth Risk Behavior Sur veys,” said Mr. |
three of the 10 leading health indicators. |
Chiotti. But the site includes much more |
• Forty-one states, four territories, and 17 large cities |
than just state-level percentages. “Visitors |
participated in 1999. Thirty-seven sites had weighted data |
can view several analyses of the data—for |
• More than 12,000 students completed national YRBS |
example, comparing responses from |
questionnaires in 1999. |
students who smoke vs. those who do not, |
• Surveys in states and large cities are conducted by educa- |
students from high-performing vs. low- |
tion and health agencies, which are funded through coop- |
performing schools, and students from |
erative agreements with CDC. |
high-economic well-being vs. low-eco- |
• Participation is voluntary, and responses are anonymous. |
nomic well-being areas,” he explained. |
(Check out the Web site at |
www.metnet.state.mt.us |
. Select |
Office of |
of adolescents. Other topics to be covered |
Public Instruction, |
under |
Services of OPI |
during the lunch meeting series include |
select |
Health Enhancement, |
and select |
Youth |
smoking, sexual activity, violence, safety, |
Risk Behavior Survey. |
) |
alcohol use, drug use, depression and |
In San Diego, YRBSS reports are |
suicide, and physical activity. |
prepared for elected officials, parents, |
Montana’s YRBSS data also are widely |
advisory groups, and health coalitions. |
used outside the state’s Office of Public |
Education staff make YRBSS presentations |
Instruction. Reports summarizing the |
to the media, school board, county health |
statewide data are sent to a multitude of |
advisory board, health agencies, advisory |
recipients, such as schools, churches, |
boards, and Healthy Start staff. “Also, |
libraries, state and local health depart- |
many of the six priority health behaviors |
ments and their constituents, the depart- |
are highlighted in our county health report |
ment of transportation, department of |
card for 2010. It’s our local version of |
justice and their constituents, and Native |
Healthy People 2010 |
, and in it we talk |
American organizations, Mr. Chiotti |
about our progress in meeting local goals,” |
noted. Reports also are shared with the |
explained Mr. Campana. |
Healthy Mothers/Healthy Babies Program |
The ways in which YRBSS data can be |
and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Montana, |
used are limited only by the resources that |
which are among nine partner agencies |
states can invest. If Ms. Bechhofer had the |
that support the Montana Youth Risk |
time and money, her hope would be to |
Behavior Survey. Funding from these |
develop model lessons for students that |
public and private partner agencies allows |
would integrate survey techniques, tech- |
cdnr |
29 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
nology, math, civics, and health education, |
To have weighted data, a state must have an |
in effect making these subjects come alive |
overall participation rate of at least 60%. |
with actual challenges facing young |
San Diego, Montana, and Michigan are |
people. “Health education has always had |
among the 22 participating areas that have |
to compete with the core academic sub- |
weighted data. Michigan has an 82% |
jects, such as English, language arts, and |
overall participation rate (calculated by |
math,” she said. So why not use health |
multiplying the percentage of participating |
education—and the YRBSS—as a cross- |
schools times the percentage of participat- |
cutting theme to teach core subjects? In a |
ing students). “We’ve had weighted data |
civics lesson, for example, students could |
since 1997, and it means the difference |
use the YRBSS data to prepare a report |
between having data that apply only to the |
showing how certain social factors have |
students who participated versus being |
influenced adolescent health. Students |
able to generalize your findings to the |
could also prepare a school board presenta- |
entire state,” explained Ms. Bechhofer. |
tion aimed at influencing school health |
“For us, the weighted YRBSS data have |
policy and programs. To enhance math |
been very powerful.” |
skills, teachers could ask students to look |
Another goal of Dr. Kann’s is to see |
at YRBSS trends for Michigan and deter- |
more collaboration between education and |
mine which changes are statistically |
health agencies. “The surveys are always |
significant. They could also learn about |
better when health and education work |
weighting data. “If math used more real- |
together to implement the survey and use |
world examples that applied to the lives of |
the data that come out of it. This is |
young people, it would be interesting and |
happening in a lot of places. For instance, |
more relevant to them,” she predicted. |
in some states—such as Alaska, Florida, |
and Mississippi—the health department |
The Power of Weighted Data |
actually conducts the survey,” she said. |
Dr. Kann has been involved in the |
Dr. Kann is pleased with the innovative |
YRBSS since it began. “In 1990, few states |
ways in which states and cities are using |
had good data to help develop programs |
YRBSS data to promote the health of |
for kids, and now many do, and that’s |
adolescents, and her goal is to have all 50 |
great. Being able to base program and |
states in the system, collecting high-quality |
policy decisions on data is always better |
data. “We’ve come a long way. The surveil- |
than just guessing what kids need,” said |
lance system has more participants today, |
Dr. Kann. “We really hope that the YRBSS |
and it is of a better quality than in years |
has made a difference in the quality of |
past. We started out with 23 states partici- |
school health programs available to kids |
pating in 1990. In 1999, 41 states partici- |
today.” |
pated, but only 22 of them had weighted |
YRBS data can be viewed online at |
data. We need to do better,” she affirmed. |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/yrbs/ |
Weighted data allow health and education |
index.htm |
. |
officials to estimate rates for the entire state. |
30 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
YRBS Data for 1990s Show How Adolescents Are Faring |
T |
he national Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) is conducted every other year to assess the prevalence of |
health risk behaviors among high school students. CDC combined survey responses into one data set to |
examine trends in risk behaviors during the 1990s. Measures were taken to control for grade, sex, and |
race/ethnicity. YRBS data are not included in the tables for risk behaviors that did not change significantly or |
that had inconsistent patterns of change during the 9-year surveillance period. |
Risk Behaviors That Improved |
—National Youth Risk Behavior Surveys, 1991–1999 |
1 |
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 |
Injury-related behaviors |
Never or rarely wore a seat belt .............................................. 25.9 19.1 21.7 19.3 16.4 |
Never or rarely wore a bicycle helmet |
96.2 92.8 92.8 88.4 85.3 |
2 . ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... . |
Rode with a drunk driver |
39.9 35.3 38.8 36.6 33.1 |
3 ... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... . |
Carried a gun |
NA 7.9 7.6 5.9 4.9 |
4 .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... . |
Carried a weapon on school property |
NA 11.8 9.8 8.5 6.9 |
4 . ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... . |
Involved in a physical fight |
42.5 41.8 38.7 36.6 35.7 |
5 . ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... . |
Involved in a physical fight |
on school property |
NA 16.2 15.5 14.8 14.2 |
5 . ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... . |
Seriously considered suicide |
29.0 24.1 24.1 20.5 19.3 |
6 .. .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... . |
Tobacco use |
Current smokeless tobacco use |
NA NA 11.4 9.3 7.8 |
4 .. .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... . |
Sexual behaviors |
Ever had sexual intercourse .................................................... 54.1 53.0 53.1 48.4 49.9 |
Had four or more sexual partners ........................................... 18.7 18.7 17.8 16.0 16.2 |
Used a condom at last sexual intercourse |
46.2 52.8 54.4 56.8 58.0 |
7 .. ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... . |
Had been taught about HIV/AIDS in school ........................ 83.3 86.1 86.3 91.5 90.6 |
Physical activity |
Participated in strengthening exercises |
47.8 51.9 50.3 51.4 53.6 |
8 . ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... . |
NA Data not collected. |
Significant linear change; p < 0 .05 |
> 1 times during the 12 months preceding the survey. |
1 |
5 |
Among students who rode bicycles during the 12 months preceding the survey. |
During the 12 months preceding the survey. |
2 |
6 |
> 1 times during the 30 days preceding the survey. |
Among currently sexually active students. |
3 |
7 |
On > 1 of the 30 days preceding the survey. |
On > 3 of the 7 days preceding the survey. |
4 |
8 |
Risk Behaviors That Worsened |
—National Youth Risk Behavior Surveys, 1991–1999 |
1 |
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 |
Tobacco use |
Frequent cigarette use |
12.7 13.8 16.1 16.7 16.8 |
2 .. ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... . |
Alcohol and other drug use |
Episodic heavy drinking |
31.3 30.0 32.6 33.4 31.5 |
3 ... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... . |
Lifetime marijuana use ........................................................... 31.3 32.8 42.4 47.1 47.2 |
Current cocaine use |
1.7 1.9 3.1 3.3 4.0 |
4 . .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .. |
Lifetime illegal steroid use ........................................................ 2.7 2.2 3.7 3.1 3.7 |
Sexual behaviors |
Used birth control pills at last sexual intercourse |
20.8 18.4 17.4 16.6 16.2 |
5 . ... .... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... . |
Physical activity |
Attended physical education class daily .................................. 41.6 34.3 25.4 27.4 29.1 |
Significant linear change; p < 0.05. |
> 1 times during the 30 days preceding the survey. |
1 |
4 |
On > 20 of the 30 days preceding the survey. |
Among currently sexually active students. |
2 |
5 |
Drank > 5 drinks of alcohol on at least one occasion on > 1 of the 30 days preceding the survey. |
3 |
cdnr |
31 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
CDC Supports International School Health |
Activities |
I |
FRESH focuses on four components that |
n an increasingly global economy and |
are used as a model, at the option of the |
environment, the health of every |
participating countries: health-related |
citizen depends on the health of |
school policies, a core framework for |
neighbors in other countries. Around the |
action, health and nutrition services, and |
world, nations are becoming aware of the |
provision of safe water and sanitation. It is |
value of school health education and |
hoped that this model will be effective in |
school health programs in reaching not |
both developed and developing nations. |
only students, but teachers and families as |
CDC also recently participated in the |
well. CDC is often called upon for techni- |
National Conference on Health-Promot- |
cal advice, assistance, and support of such |
ing Schools in Beijing, People’s Republic of |
efforts. |
China, where one important focus of |
In the United States, CDC is the federal |
school health programs has been elimina- |
focal point for school health education, |
tion of helminth (parasites such as hook- |
providing guidance and support for school |
worms and pinworms) infections, which |
health education and health promotion |
occur at a very high rate, especially in |
activities to state and local education |
China’s river regions. |
agencies throughout the country. CDC |
Among other countries that have asked |
offers formal international support of |
for or been offered technical assistance are |
school health through a cooperative |
the Russian Federation, South Africa, |
agreement with the World Health Organi- |
Australia, and Vietnam. CDC offers |
zation (WHO), and informal support |
technical assistance to Russia through the |
through collaborative efforts with several |
U.S.–Russia Joint Commission on Eco- |
countries. For example, CDC participates |
nomical and Technical Cooperation on |
in WHO’s Mega Country Health Promo- |
School Health, and has sent representatives |
tion Network, which aims to enhance |
to two forums focused on Russia’s move |
health and health promotion strategies in |
toward health-promoting schools and |
countries with populations of 100 million |
other school health initiatives. CDC is a |
or more. The “Mega” countries are China, |
member of the U.S.–South Africa Bina- |
Bangladesh, India, Nigeria, Brazil, Mexico, |
tional Commission on School Health. |
Russia, Pakistan, Indonesia, and the |
Because HIV infection rates in South |
United States.” WHO characterizes a |
Africa are among the highest in the world, |
Health-Promoting School as a school that |
the technical assistance provided to this |
is “constantly strengthening its capacity as |
country for its school health programs |
a healthy setting for living, learning, and |
focuses on HIV prevention in schools. |
working.” Four United Nations agencies— |
For more information on the Mega |
WHO, UNICEF, UNESCO, and the |
Country Health Promotion Network and |
World Bank—are working together as part |
the Global School Health Initiative, visit |
of FRESH to help schools around the |
the Web site of WHO’s Department of |
world improve the health, and conse- |
Health Promotion, Noncommunicable |
quently the education, of young people. |
Disease Prevention and Surveillance on the |
Additional technical assistance is pro- |
Internet at |
www.who.int/hps |
. More |
vided through the FRESH (Focusing |
information about CDC’s school health |
Resources on Effective School Health) |
programs may be found online at |
program, “A FRESH Start to Improving |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash |
. |
the Quality and Equity of Education.” |
32 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
Media Campaign Planned to Improve the |
Health of America’s Children |
U |
sing new funding first provided by |
market healthy behaviors to young people. |
Congress for fiscal year 2001, |
The campaign, titled by Congress the |
CDC is mounting a campaign |
National Campaign to Change Children’s |
that employs the best principles of market- |
Health Behavior, will involve young people |
ing and communication strategies to |
in all aspects of campaign planning and |
influence America’s children to develop |
implementation, and will enlist the |
habits that foster good health over a |
support and involvement of parents and |
lifetime–including physical activity. Young |
other role models. CDC will work with |
people today are a multimedia generation |
marketing and media experts to design and |
with high rates of media consumption. |
implement a successful media campaign. |
These media sources, which include |
For more information, call Faye Wong, |
television, radio, music, print, and Internet |
RD, MPH, Project Director, at 770/488- |
use, offer a tremendous opportunity to |
5131, or E-mail fwong@cdc.gov. |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
Conferences |
Plan for Success: Strengthening the Public’s Health Through Health Promotion |
19 |
National Conference on Health Education and Health Promotion |
th |
You are invited to join the Association of State and Territorial Directors of Health Promotion and Public |
Health Education (ASTDHPPHE), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and public health |
professionals from across the nation for the 19 |
National Conference on Health Education and Health Promo- |
th |
tion. The conference will be held April 25–27, 2001, in Atlanta, Georgia, at the Crown Plaza Ravinia. Take |
advantage of this opportunity to share successful health education and health promotion programs for a variety |
of settings, levels, diverse populations, and public health issues. For more information or to register, contact |
Rose Marie Matulionis, Executive Director, ATDHPPHE, at 202/312-6460 or fax 202/336-6012 or visit |
www.astdhpphe.org/conf19/19confindex.htm |
. |
CDC’s Diabetes Translation Conference 2001 |
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation (DDT) will be hosting its annual conference April 30–May 3, 2001, |
in Seattle, Washington. This year’s theme is Diabetes Across the Life Stages. The conference will bring together |
a wide community of local, state, federal, territorial, and private-sector diabetes partners to explore science, |
policy, and education as they relate to diabetes in every life stage. For more information, call toll-free |
877/CDC-DIAB, E-mail diabetes@cdc.gov, or visit DDT’s Web site at |
www.cdc.gov/diabete |
s. |
CDC’s 2002 National Leadership Conference |
CDC’s 2002 National Leadership Conference will convene February 8-13, 2002, at the Renaissance Hotel in |
Washington, D.C. Each year this conference offers an outstanding opportunity for learning and networking |
among dedicated professionals in the fields of HIV/AIDS prevention and school health, including those from |
state and local education, health and social service agencies, national nongovernmental organizations, federal |
cdnr |
33 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
agencies, colleges and universities, and philanthropic organizations. Information about the 2001 Leadership |
Conference and the program for the 2002 Leadership Conference will be posted in the coming months at |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash |
. |
National Oral Health Care Conference |
“Dental Public Health: Enhancing Health, Access, and Partnerships” will be the theme of the next National |
Oral Health Conference to be held April 30–May 2, 2001, at the Marriott Hotel Downtown in Portland, |
Oregon. The program will focus on Medicaid and access issues, national oral health initiatives, health promo- |
tion and disease prevention, utilization cost-effectiveness and benefits of programs, education of health person- |
nel, and innovative program evaluation. The meeting is sponsored by the Association of State and Territorial |
Dental Directors, the American Association of Public Health Dentistry, CDC, the Health Care Financing |
Administration, and the Health Resources and Services Administration. More information about the confer- |
ence is available at the following Web sites: |
www.astdd.org |
or |
www.aaphd.org |
. |
First National CDC Prevention Conference on Heart Disease and Stroke |
CDC, the American Heart Association, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute are cosponsoring |
the First National CDC Prevention Conference on Heart Disease and Stroke to be held August 22–24, 2001, |
in Atlanta, Georgia, at the Westin Peachtree Plaza. The goal of the conference is to increase knowledge and |
provide opportunities for information sharing, networking, and skill building for state health department staff |
and cardiovascular health (CVH) partners to build and expand comprehensive CVH state programs. More |
information about the conference is available at |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/cvd |
. |
2001 Cancer Conference |
CDC’s 2001 Cancer Conference will be held September 4–7, 2001, in Atlanta, Georgia, at the Marriott |
Marquis Hotel. The theme is “Using Science to Build Comprehensive Cancer Programs: A 2001 Odyssey.” |
The conference will explore evidence-based science and how it applies in a public health setting. Short courses |
will be held September 4 as part of the preconference activities. Abstract submission deadline is March 19, |
2001, and the registration deadline for the CyberExpo, exhibit booths, and tabletop exhibits is June 27, 2001. |
To be added to the mailing list for the conference, write Laura Shelton at PSA, 2957 Clairmont Road, Suite |
480, Atlanta, GA 30349, or call 404/633-6869, extension 214. For more information, E-mail Kathleen Carey, |
Conference Co-Chair, at kcarey@cdc.gov or visit |
www.cdc.gov/cancer/conference2001 |
. |
16 |
National Conference on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control |
th |
The National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion will host its 16 |
annual confer- |
th |
ence February 27–March 1, 2002, at the Sheraton Atlanta Hotel in Atlanta, Georgia. Participants will learn |
about emerging chronic disease issues, data applications, and intervention research; network with health and |
other professionals; develop new working relationships; and discover what others are doing in communications, |
training, policy, and partnership. For more information, E-mail Dale Wilson at dnw3@cdc.gov or visit |
www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/conference |
. |
Communications |
Second Annual National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month—March 2001 |
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cancer killer in the United States. The risk of developing this disease |
increases with age; 93% of cases occur in people aged 50 years or older. However, most Americans in that age- |
group are not screened for colorectal cancer. Therefore, the National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month was |
34 |
Winter 2001 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
established to increase awareness and encourage prevention and early detection through screening. March 2000 |
was the first National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month, and 34 leading organizations, including CDC, |
joined as collaborating partners. The Cancer Research Foundation of America (CRFA) spearheaded the drive to |
have the month of March officially designated as National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. To learn more |
about CRFA and future planning for National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month 2001, call 1-877-35- |
COLON or visit |
www.preventcancer.org |
. |
Information Sources |
National Oral Health Surveillance System Now Available |
The National Oral Health Surveillance System (NOHSS) is a new policy resource available online. The |
NOHSS Web site is designed to provide national and state information on oral health indicators including the |
percentage of the adult population reporting a dental visit during the past year, the percentage of adults who |
had their teeth cleaned during the past year, the percentage of senior population with complete tooth loss, and |
the percentage of a state’s population on a community water system whose water is fluoridated. NOHSS also |
includes selected information from the Synopses of State Oral Health Programs, which contains state-specific |
information on demographics, as well as oral health infrastructure, administration, and program activities. |
Additional oral health data will be added each year as they become available. For more information, visit |
www.cdc.gov/nohss |
. |
Sample Medicaid Dental Purchasing Specifications |
Sample Purchasing Specifications for Medicaid Pediatric Dental and Oral Health Services are now available. |
These specifications describe comprehensive oral health care services for children and adolescents and are |
especially useful for State Medicaid agencies, State Children’s Health Insurance Programs (SCHIPs), and |
insurance providers that develop contracts for dental services for low-income children. To learn more about |
these specifications, visit |
www.gwu.edu/~chsrp/sps/dental |
. |
NCCDPHP News |
Elizabeth Majestic Selected as NCCDPHP Associate Director |
Elizabeth Majestic, MA, was named Associate Director for Planning, Evaluation, and Legislation, Office of the |
Director, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) and began her |
new assignment on February 1. Since 1997, Dr. Majestic has served as Deputy Director, Office on Smoking |
and Health (OSH), NCCDPHP, and, since September, Acting Director, OSH, while a search was under way |
for the Director position. Before joining OSH, she served for 6 years as Chief, Special Populations Program, |
Division of Adolescent and School Health, NCCDPHP. |
Congressman Porter Recognized as “Champion of Prevention” at 15 |
National |
th |
Conference on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control |
At the 15 |
National Conference on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control held November 29–December 1, |
th |
2000, in Washington, D.C., CDC Director Jeffrey P. Koplan, MD, MPH, presented CDC’s Champion of |
Prevention Award to U.S. Congressman John E. Porter of Illinois in recognition of his work in promoting and |
cdnr |
35 |
Special Focus: |
School Health Programs |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
cdnotes |
protecting the health of all Americans, particularly the underserved. Dr. Koplan praised Congressman Porter as |
a “true advocate of public health” and for being the first House Appropriation Subcommittee Chairman to visit |
CDC. In addition to presiding over significant funding increases in CDC’s budget for improved facilities, |
Congressman Porter supported public health programs for breast and cervical cancer, polio eradication, domes- |
tic violence, oral health, immunizations, obesity and physical activity, school health programs, cardiovascular |
diseases, and tobacco control. “It is because of efforts of leaders like Congressman Porter that scientists can |
continue to open doors that will lead to longer, healthier, and more satisfying lives for people with chronic |
disease,” said James S. Marks, MD, MPH, Director, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and |
Health Promotion, CDC. |
CDC Honors HIV/AIDS Education Leaders |
CDC—in association with the U.S. Department of Education; the Society of State Directors of Health, Physi- |
cal Education, and Recreation; and the Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University—presented the |
following awards at the National Leadership Conference to Strengthen HIV/AIDS Education and Coordinated |
School Health Programs, January 22–25, 2001, in Washington, D.C.: |
Leadership Award (Coordinated School Health Programs): |
Patricia Nichols, Department of Education, Michigan (retired) |
Leadership Award (HIV): |
Joyce Johnson, Department of Education, New Hampshire |
Award of Excellence: |
Brenda Z. Greene, National School Boards Association |
Simon A. McNeely Award: |
Marshall Kreuter, Division of Adult and Community Health, NCCDPHP, CDC |
Director’s Special Award |
Gordon Ambach, Council of Chief State School Officers |
Director’s Special Award: |
William Datema, Society of State Directors of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation |
Diabetes Stamp |
The United States Postal Service will issue a diabetes stamp March 16 in Boston at the Joslin Diabetes Center; |
the stamp will go on sale nationwide the same day. The Boston event will feature celebrities and officials from |
the postal service and their partners from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American |
Diabetes Association, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, and the National Institutes of |
Health. The event will be an all-day symposium and workshop series with diabetes screening and informational |
booths. The diabetes stamp encourages everyone to “Know More About Diabetes” and will help promote |
awareness about the need for early detection and for continued research and education to help find a cure for |
this devastating disease. Designed by James Steinberg, the stamp includes two elements associated with diabetes |
testing and research—a microscope and a test tube containing blood. To see an image of the stamp, visit the |
CDC Diabetes Public Health Resource Web page at |
www.cdc.gov/diabetes |
or call toll-free 1-877-CDC- |
DIAB. |
Chronic Disease Notes & Reports |
is pub- |
lished by the National Center for Chronic |
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, |
Centers for Disease Control and Preven- |
tion, Atlanta, Georgia. The contents are in |
the public domain. |
Director, Centers for Disease Control |
and Prevention |
Jeffrey P. Koplan, MD, MPH |
Director, National Center for Chronic |
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion |
James S. Marks, MD, MPH |
Managing Editor Guest Editor |
Teresa Ramsey Jane Zanca |
Staff Writers |
Linda Elsner Teresa Ramsey |
Valerie Johnson Diana Toomer |
Suzanne Johnson-DeLeon |
Guest Writer Layout & Design |
Linda Orgain Herman Surles |
Copy Editor |
Suzanne Johnson-DeLeon |
Address correspondence to Managing Editor, |
Chronic Disease Notes & Reports |
, Centers for Disease |
Control and Prevention, Mail Stop K–11, 4770 |
Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717; |
770/488-5050, fax 770/488-5095 |
E-mail: ccdinfo@cdc.gov |
NCCDPHP Internet Web site: |
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp |
DEPARTMENT OF |
FIRST-CLASS MAIL |
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES |
POSTAGE & FEES PAID |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
PHS/CDC |
Mail Stop K–11 |
Permit No. G-284 |
Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3717 |
Official Business |
Penalty for Private Use $300 |
Return Service Requested |