| 
   |  | 
	
		| ACRONYMS |  
		| Acronym  | Meaning  |  
		| ABS  | Australian Bureau of Statistics  |  
		| AIHW  | Australian Institute of Health and Welfare  |  
		| BoD  | Burden of Disease  |  
		| BMI  | Body Mass Index  |  
		| COPD  | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease  |  
		| CURF  | Confidentialised Unit Record File  |  
		| DALY  | Disability Adjusted Life Years  |  
		| DTF  | Department of Treasury and Finance  |  
		| DCIS  | Disease Costs and Impact Study  |  
		| FCA  | Friction Cost Approach  |  
		| GDP  | Gross Domestic Product  |  
		| HCA  | Human Capital Approach  |  
		| IPV  | Intimate Partner Violence  |  
		| LL  | Lower Limit of a range of values  |  
		| NHMRC  | National Health and Medical Research Council  |  
		| NPV  | Net Present Value  |  
		| NHS  | National Health Survey  |  
		| OECD  | Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
		 |  
		| PAF  | Population Attributable Risk Fraction  |  
		| RADL  | Remote Access Data Library  |  
		| RR  | Relative Risk  |  
		| SEIFA  | Socio-Economic Indexes For Areas  |  
		| UI  | Uncertainty Interval  |  
		| UL  | Upper Limit of a range of values  |  
		| VicHealth  | Victorian Health Promotion Foundation  |  
		| WHO  | World Health Organization  |  
	
		| Health sector offsets  | These are made up of reductions in the costs of 
		future health care delivery (for example, hospital admissions, General 
		Practitioner visits, pharmaceuticals and allied health services) which 
		can be avoided by reductions in the number of cases of disease. Cost 
		offsets are the estimated resources consumed in the diagnosis, treatment 
		and care of preventable events that could become available for other 
		uses. These can be considered as ‘opportunity costs’. However, such estimates are only 
		indicative of financial savings and should be interpreted with caution 
		because they are not estimates of immediately realisable financial 
		savings. |  
		| Household production  | The non-paid hours of time allocated to household 
		duties of cooking, shopping, cleaning, maintenance etc. This is often 
		referred to in the literature as non-market based production, since it 
		is not traded in the usual way as a marketable item.  |  
		| Human Capital Approach  | In the context of productivity, the human capital 
		method is based on estimated output losses from cessation or reduction 
		of production due to morbidity and mortality; or conversely, from gains 
		made in human capital (both in terms of workforce participation and 
		productivity increases) due to investments in health care (Sapsford and 
		Tzannatos 1993). This is valued as gross employee earnings in the case 
		of the paid workforce.  |  
		| Ideal target  | The feasible risk factor prevalence reduction target. 
		This ideal target was established: by selecting a country comparable to 
		Australia with a lower risk factor prevalence (Arcadian ideal); or 
		according to expert opinion, current guidelines and/or relevant 
		literature.  |  
		| Net present value  | The value of benefits (income or health benefits), 
		which are expected to be received in the future, at a specified 
		reference year (2008 in this analysis), taking the time value of returns 
		into account (discounted by 3% in this project).  |  
		| Not in the labour force  | Individuals not currently active in, or looking for, 
		employment. For example, students / retirees.  |  
		| Opportunity cost  | Opportunity costs are defined as the value of time or 
		any other ‘input’ in its highest value alternative use. Therefore, 
		opportunity costs represent the lost benefit of not selecting the next 
		best alternative use of the resource inputs.  |  
		| Population Attributable Risk Fraction  | The proportion by which the incidence rate of a 
		disease could be reduced over a time period, if the risk factor was to 
		reach a theoretical minimum, assuming causation between risk factor and 
		disease.  |  
		| Preferred conservative estimate  | Estimates calculated using the Friction Cost 
		Approach, as opposed to the Human Capital Approach, are the preferred 
		conservative estimates for valuing productivity costs in this study. As 
		a number of assumptions needed to be made for modelling to occur, the 
		FCA is preferred as it represents a more conservative estimate of the 
		production gain likely to follow a reduction in risk behaviour.  |  
		| Productivity gains/losses  | Reflect changes in workforce participation and 
		absenteeism associated with health status  |  
		| Progressive target  | The mid-point between the current prevalence of a 
		risk factor and the ideal target prevalence for risk factor reduction. 
		For example, the current prevalence of tobacco smoking in Australia is 
		23%, the ideal prevalence target is 15% and therefore, the progressive 
		target is 19%.  |  
	
		| Reference year  | The year used for determination and valuation of 
		costs, benefits and population health impact.  |  
		| Replacement costs  | Valued at the average hourly rates for commercially 
		available domestic services and child care. See household production. |  
		| Socio-Economic Indexes For Areas  | This suite of indexes ranks geographic areas across 
		Australia in terms of their socio-economic characteristics (from most 
		disadvantaged to least disadvantaged) on the basis of several factors 
		which include education, income and others (Australian Bureau of 
		Statistics 2008a).  |  
		| Standard drink  | A standard drink is equal to 10g (12.5ml) of alcohol 
		(National Health and Medical Research Council 2001).  |  
		| Threshold analysis  | An analytic method used to provide evidence for 
		priority setting and policy decisions, including resource allocation and 
		research priority decisions. It is employed in decision contexts when 
		some information is available, but other important variables are 
		missing.  |  
		| Workforce participants  | People working part-time, full time or looking for 
		work.  |  
	
		| Definitions of risk factors used in this project as per 
		the 2004-05 National Health Survey (Australian Bureau of Statistics 
		2006)  |  
		| Alcohol consumption  | Long term high risk alcohol consumption: Greater than 
		75ml of alcohol consumed per day for men, and greater than 50ml of 
		alcohol consumed per day for women.  |  
		| Long term low risk alcohol consumption: Less than 
		50ml of alcohol consumed per day for men, and less than 25ml of alcohol 
		consumed per day for women.  |  
		| High body mass index  | Obese or overweight: BMI greater than 25, based on 
		self-reported height and weight.  |  
		| Normal weight: BMI less than 25, based on 
		self-reported height and weight (including underweight).  |  
		| Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption  | Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption: 
		Consumption below the recommended minimum of 2 serves fruit and 5 serves 
		vegetables daily.  |  
		| Adequate consumption: Consumption at or above the 
		recommended minimum of 2 serves fruit and 5 serves vegetables daily.
		 |  
		| Intimate partner violence  | High psychological distress has been used as a proxy 
		for current exposure to intimate partner violence: High or very high 
		levels of psychological distress (score 22-50 on the Kessler 
		Psychological Distress Scale -10).  |  
		| Moderate psychological distress has been used as a 
		proxy for past exposure to intimate partner violence: Moderate levels of 
		psychological distress (score 10-21 on the Kessler Psychological 
		Distress Scale -10).  |  
		| Physical inactivity  | Inactive: Sedentary or low activity level.  |  
		| Active: Moderate to high activity level.  |  
		| Tobacco smoking  | Current smokers: Persons who smoke tobacco on a 
		regular or irregular daily basis.  |  
		| Ex-smokers: Persons who no longer smoke on a regular 
		or irregular basis.  |    |  |   |